Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24334794›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2014

A mathematical model to evaluate the routine use of fecal microbiota transplantation to prevent incident and recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.

Eric T Lofgren, Rebekah W Moehring, Deverick J Anderson, David J Weber, Nina H Fefferman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Dramatic reduction in Clostridium difficile ribotype 027-associated mortality with early fecal transplantation by the nasogastric route: a preliminary report.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Fecal microbiota therapy: ready for prime time?Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric T LofgrenDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Rebekah W Moehring
Deverick J Anderson
David J Weber
Nina H Fefferman

Funding

UNC CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD: BPCAUL1RR025747 · NCRR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUNGE, MARSCHALL S. · 2008 to 2011
$44.6M
Training in Infectious Disease Epidemiology (TIDE)T32AI070114 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Brian W Pence · 2007 to 2026
$4.0M
Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in a CommuniK23AI095357 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, DEVERICK JOHN · 2011 to 2015
$644k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025747NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025747NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI095357NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI070114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been suggested as a new treatment to manage Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). With use of a mathematical model of C. difficile within an intensive care unit (ICU), we examined the potential impact of routine FMT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A mathematical model of C. difficile transmission, supplemented with prospective cohort, surveillance, and billing data from hospitals in the southeastern United States.

methodsCohort, surveillance, and billing data as well as data from the literature were used to construct a compartmental model of CDI within an ICU. Patients were defined as being in 1 of 6 potential health states: uncolonized and at low risk; uncolonized and at high risk; colonized and at low risk; colonized and at high risk; having CDI; or treated with FMT.

resultsThe use of FMT to treat patients after CDI was associated with a statistically significant reduction in recurrence but not with a reduction in incident cases. Treatment after administration of high-risk medications, such as antibiotics, did not result in a decrease in recurrence but did result in a statistically significant difference in incident cases across treatment groups, although whether this difference was clinically relevant was questionable.

conclusionsOur study is a novel mathematical model that examines the effect of FMT on the prevention of recurrent and incident CDI. The routine use of FMT represents a promising approach to reduce complex recurrent cases, but a reduction in CDI incidence will require the use of other methods to prevent transmission.

Indexed as

Biological TherapyClostridioides difficileModels, BiologicalCarrier StateComputer SimulationEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFecesHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntestinesMathematical ConceptsProspective StudiesSecondary PreventionSoutheastern United States

Identifiers

PMID24334794
PMCPMC3977703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.