Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24334520›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2013

The role of perfusion effects in monitoring of chemoradiotherapy of rectal carcinoma using diffusion-weighted imaging.

Maria-Katharina Ganten, Maximilian Schuessler, Tobias Bäuerle, Marc Muenter, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Alexandra Jensen, Karsten Brand, Margret Dueck, Julien Dinkel, Annette Kopp-Schneider and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Application of magnetic resonance diffusion kurtosis imaging for distinguishing histopathologic subtypes and grades of rectal carcinoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maria-Katharina GantenDepartment of Radiology (E010), German Cancer Research Center, INF 280 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Maximilian SchuesslerDepartment of Radiology (E010), German Cancer Research Center, INF 280 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Tobias BäuerleDepartment of Medical Physics in Radiology (E020), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marc MuenterDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Ruprecht-Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heinz-Peter SchlemmerDepartment of Radiology (E010), German Cancer Research Center, INF 280 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexandra JensenDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Ruprecht-Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karsten BrandDepartment of Pathology, Ruprecht-Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Margret DueckDepartment of Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Julien DinkelDepartment of Radiology (E010), German Cancer Research Center, INF 280 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA, USA.
Annette Kopp-SchneiderDepartment of Biostatistics (C060), Medical Biostatistics German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Klaus FritzscheMedical and Biological Informatics (E130), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Quantitative Imaging Based Disease Characterization (E011), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bram StieltjesQuantitative Imaging Based Disease Characterization (E011), German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to characterize and understand the therapy-induced changes in diffusion parameters in rectal carcinoma under chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The current literature shows conflicting results in this regard. We applied the intravoxel incoherent motion model, which allows for the differentiation between diffusion (D) and perfusion (f) effects, to further elucidate potential underlying causes for these divergent reports. MATERIALS AND

methodsEighteen patients with primary rectal carcinoma undergoing preoperative CRT were examined before, during, and after neoadjuvant CRT using diffusion-weighted imaging. Using the intravoxel incoherent motion approach, f and D were extracted and compared with postoperative tumor downstaging and volume.

resultsInitial diffusion-derived parameters were within a narrow range (D1 = 0.94 ± 0.12 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s). At follow-up, D rose significantly (D2 = 1.18 ± 0.13 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; P < 0.0001) and continued to increase significantly after CRT (D3 = 1.24 ± 0.14 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; P < 0.0001). The perfusion fraction f did not change significantly (f1 = 9.4 ± 2.0%, f2 = 9.4 ± 1.7%, f3 = 9.5 ± 2.7%). Mean volume (V) decreased significantly (V1 = 16,992 ± 13,083 mm(3); V2 = 12,793 ± 8317 mm(3), V3 = 9718 ± 6154 mm(3)). T-downstaging (10:18 patients) showed no significant correlation with diffusion-derived parameters.

conclusionsConflicting results in the literature considering apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) changes in rectal carcinoma under CRT for patients showing T-downstaging are unlikely to be due to perfusion effects. Our data support the view that under effective therapy, an increase in D/ADC can be observed.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRectal NeoplasmsTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID24334520
PMCPMC3864228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.