Trial reportHaematologica2014
Combination therapy of hydroxycarbamide with anagrelide in patients with essential thrombocythemia in the evaluation of Xagrid(R) efficacy and long-term safety study.
Trial report in Haematologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00567502 (A Non-Interventional, Post Authorisation Safety Study, to Continuously Monitor Safety and Pregnancy Outcomes in a Cohort of At-Risk Essential Thrombocythaemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Non-Interventional, Post Authorisation Safety Study, to Continuously Monitor Safety and Pregnancy Outcomes in a Cohort of At-Risk Essential Thrombocythaemia (ET) Subjects Exposed to Xagrid Compared to Other Conventional Cytoreductive Treatments
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A phase 3b, multicenter, open-label extension study of the long-term safety of anagrelide in Japanese adults with essential thrombocythemia.International journal of hematology · 2018Trial
- Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Anagrelide Extended-Release Formulation in Healthy Subjects: Food Intake and Comparison With a Reference Product.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2018Trial
- [Efficacy and safety of anagrelide in treatment of essential thrombocythemia: multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2015Trial
- Phase III, single-arm study investigating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of anagrelide as a second-line treatment in high-risk Japanese patients with essential thrombocythemia.International journal of hematology · 2014Trial
- Review
- Initial Low-Dose Hydroxyurea and Anagrelide Combination in Essential Thrombocythemia: Comparable Response with Lower Toxicity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Essential Thrombocythemia in Adolescents and Young Adults: Clinical Aspects, Treatment Options and Unmet Medical Needs.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023Review
- Prognostic value of modified criteria for hydroxyurea resistance or intolerance in patients with high-risk essential thrombocythemia.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- An overview of kinase downregulators and recent advances in discovery approaches.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021Review
- Impact of platelets on major thrombosis in patients with a normal white blood cell count in essential thrombocythemia.European journal of haematology · 2021Article
- Efficacy and safety of anagrelide as a first-line drug in cytoreductive treatment-naïve essential thrombocythemia patients in a real-world setting.European journal of haematology · 2019Article
- Guideline on myeloproliferative neoplasms: Associacão Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Cellular: Project guidelines: Associação Médica Brasileira - 2019.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy · 2019Article
- The role of thrombocytapheresis in the contemporary management of hyperthrombocytosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms: A case-based review.Leukemia research · 2017Review
- The Use of Anagrelide in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, with Focus on Essential Thrombocythemia.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Available information is limited regarding the use of cytoreductive combination therapy in high-risk patients with essential thrombocythemia. This analysis aims to evaluate the clinical relevance and patterns of cytoreductive combination treatment in European high-risk patients with essential thrombocythemia in the Evaluation of Xagrid(®) Efficacy and Long-term Safety study. Of 3643 patients, 347 (9.5%) received combination therapy. Data were recorded at each 6-month update. Of 347 patients who received combination therapy, 304 (87.6%) received hydroxycarbamide + anagrelide. Monotherapies received before this combination were hydroxycarbamide (n=167, 54.9%) and anagrelide (n=123, 40.5%). Median weekly doses of hydroxycarbamide and anagrelide were: 7000 and 10.5 mg when used as prior monotherapy; 3500 and 7.0 mg when used as add-on treatment. Overall, median platelet counts were 581 × 10(9)/L and 411 × 10(9)/L before and after starting hydroxycarbamide + anagrelide, respectively. In patients with paired data (n=153), the number of patients with platelet counts less than 400 × 10(9)/L increased from 33 (21.6%) to 74 (48.4%; P<0.0001), and with platelet counts less than 600 × 10(9)/L, from 82 (53.6%) to 132 (86.3%; P<0.0001). Hydroxycarbamide + anagrelide was discontinued in 158 patients: 76 (48.1%) stopped hydroxycarbamide, 59 (37.3%) stopped anagrelide, 19 (12.0%) stopped both and 4 (2.5%) had another therapy added. The most frequent reasons for discontinuation were intolerance/side-effects, lack of efficacy, and therapeutic strategy. Combination therapy, usually hydroxycarbamide + anagrelide, is used in approximately 10% of all high-risk patients with essential thrombocythemia and may be a useful approach in treating patients for whom monotherapy is unsatisfactory. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier:NCT00567502).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.