Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24333595›Full record

ArticleNanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine2014

Magnetic nanoparticle-based immunoassay for rapid detection of influenza infections by using an integrated microfluidic system.

Lien-Yu Hung, Jui-Cheng Chang, Yi-Che Tsai, Chih-Chia Huang, Chih-Peng Chang, Chen-Sheng Yeh, Gwo-Bin Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lien-Yu HungDepartment of Power Mechanical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Jui-Cheng ChangDepartment of Chemistry, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Yi-Che TsaiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chih-Chia HuangDepartment of Chemistry, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chih-Peng ChangDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chen-Sheng YehDepartment of Chemistry, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. Electronic address: csyeh@mail.ncku.edu.tw.
Gwo-Bin LeeDepartment of Power Mechanical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan; Institute of NanoEngineering and Microsystems, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan. Electronic address: gwobin@pme.nthu.edu.tw.
National Cheng Kung University · TWNational Tsing Hua University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic manganese ferrite (MnFe2O4) nanoparticles with approximately 100nm in diameter were used to improve the performance of an immunoassay for detecting influenza infections. The synthesized nanoparticles were tested for long-term storage to confirm the stability of their thermal decomposition process. Then, an integrated microfluidic system was developed to perform the diagnosis process automatically, including virus purification and detection. To apply these nanoparticles for influenza diagnosis, a micromixer was optimized to reduce the dead volume within the microfluidic chip. Furthermore, the mixing index of the micromixer could achieve as high as 97% in 2seconds. The optical signals showed that this nanoparticle-based immunoassay with dynamic mixing could successfully achieve a detection limit of influenza as low as 0.007 HAU. When compared with the 4.5-μm magnetic beads, the optical signals of the MnFe2O4 nanoparticles were twice as sensitive. Furthermore, five clinical specimens were tested to verify the usability of the developed system. FROM THE CLINICAL EDITOR: In this study, magnetic manganese ferrite nanoparticles were used to improve the performance of a novel immunoassay for the rapid and efficient detection of influenza infections.

Indexed as

AnimalsDogsFerrosoferric OxideHumansImmunoassayInfluenza, HumanMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesNanoparticlesOrthomyxoviridaeSensitivity and SpecificityFerrosoferric OxideInfluenzaMicrofluidicsNanoparticlesSurface modification

Identifiers

PMID24333595
PMCPMC7106285
OpenAlexW1963512195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.