Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24332649›Full record

ArticleUrologic oncology2014

Quality of physician-patient relationships is associated with the influence of physician treatment recommendations among patients with prostate cancer who chose active surveillance.

Heather Orom, D Lynn Homish, Gregory G Homish, Willie Underwood

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urologic oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic review of shared decision-making in surgery.The British journal of surgery · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Impact of a Genomic Test on Treatment Decision in a Predominantly African American Population With Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Characterizing Perceptions Around the Patient-Oncologist Relationship: a Qualitative Focus Group Analysis.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  8. Selecting Active Surveillance: Decision Making Factors for Men with a Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Too much medicine: not enough trust?Journal of medical ethics · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heather OromCommunity Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY. Electronic address: horom@buffalo.edu.
D Lynn HomishCommunity Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Gregory G HomishCommunity Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Willie UnderwoodUrologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Race, Prostate Cancer Treatment, and Treatment Decision Difficulty and RegretR01CA152425 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI OROM, HEATHER, UNDERWOOD, WILLIE · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWith growing evidence that some men with prostate cancer (PCa) may be overtreated, clinicians need greater knowledge of the factors that influence uptake of treatment recommendations in general, and specifically, uptake of active surveillance in patients for whom this is an appropriate treatment option. The objective of this study was to test the role of the quality of the physician-patient relationship in the choice to be followed by active surveillance, rather than receive definitive therapy (e.g., surgery and radiation). We hypothesized that patients would have been more influenced by their physicians' treatment recommendations to the degree that they held more positive perceptions of their relationship with their physicians, independent of treatment recommended. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with PCa (n = 120) being followed with active surveillance at a comprehensive cancer center completed self-report assessments of their treatment decision-making process. Generalized estimating equations were used to model the association between participants' perceptions of their relationships with their physicians and influence of these physicians' recommendations on their treatment decision.

resultsAfter controlling for the type of treatment recommended, Gleason score, and education, 3 predictors, trust in the physician, perceived closeness with the physician, and the degree to which the physician shared control over treatment decision making, were associated with greater influence of physician's treatment recommendation. Receiving a recommendation for active surveillance, compared with definitive therapy, was also associated with higher perceived trust, closeness, shared control over treatment decision making, lower likelihood of having been treated poorly by a physician, and greater influence of physician's treatment recommendation.

conclusionsThere is increasing concern that patients with relatively less aggressive PCa, older age, or serious comorbidities are being unnecessarily treated with surgery or radiation, putting them at risk for side effects, and contributing to high health care costs. When active surveillance is an appropriate course of treatment, the quality of patients' relationships with their physicians may be a determinant of following a recommendation for active surveillance. Results may have implications for treatment uptake in general, indicating that the quality of the physician-patient relationship, including trust, closeness, shared decision making--all elements of patient-centered care--may be important motivators of treatment adoption and adherence.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision MakingPhysician-Patient RelationsAgedFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPhysician's RolePrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsTrustdecision makingpatient compliancephysician-patient relationsprostate neoplasmstrustwatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID24332649
PMCPMC4004652
OpenAlexW2065280657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.