Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24332642›Full record

ReviewUrologic oncology2016

Preclinical and clinical development of DNA vaccines for prostate cancer.

V T Colluru, Laura E Johnson, Brian M Olson, Douglas G McNeel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Urologic oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Nanoparticle cancer vaccines: Design considerations and recent advances.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. DNA vaccines for prostate cancer.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A primer on tumour immunology and prostate cancer immunotherapy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Instigation of the epoch of nanovaccines in cancer immunotherapy.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V T ColluruDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI.
Laura E JohnsonDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI.
Brian M OlsonDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI.
Douglas G McNeelDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI. Electronic address: dm3@medicine.wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · US

Funding

Androgen Receptor Targeted Vaccines for Prostate CancerR01CA142608 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MCNEEL, DOUGLAS G. · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142608NCI NIH HHS R01CA142608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States. It is also the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men, making it one of the largest public health concerns today. Prostate cancer is an ideal disease for immunotherapies because of the generally slow progression, the dispensability of the target organ in the patient population, and the availability of several tissue-specific antigens. As such, several therapeutic vaccines have entered clinical trials, with one autologous cellular vaccine (sipuleucel-T) recently gaining Food and Drug Administration approval after demonstrating overall survival benefit in randomized phase III clinical trials. DNA-based vaccines are safe, economical, alternative "off-the-shelf" approaches that have undergone extensive evaluation in preclinical models. In fact, the first vaccine approved in the United States for the treatment of cancer was a DNA vaccine for canine melanoma. Several prostate cancer-specific DNA vaccines have been developed in the last decade and have shown promising results in early phase clinical trials. This review summarizes anticancer human DNA vaccine trials, with a focus on those conducted for prostate cancer. We conclude with an outline of special considerations important for the development and successful translation of DNA vaccines from the laboratory to the clinic.

Indexed as

AnimalsCancer VaccinesClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHumansImmunotherapyMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVaccines, DNACancer VaccinesVaccines, DNAClinical trialsDNA vaccinesProstate cancerTumor vaccine

Identifiers

PMID24332642
PMCPMC4053490
OpenAlexW1984455804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.