Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24332401›Full record

ArticleVeterinary parasitology2014

Genotyping Toxoplasma gondii from wildlife in Pennsylvania and identification of natural recombinants virulent to mice.

J P Dubey, K Van Why, S K Verma, S Choudhary, O C H Kwok, A Khan, M S Behinke, L D Sibley, L R Ferreira, S Oliveira and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary parasitology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Isolation and Characterization of a ViablePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence and genetic characterization ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Additional evidence of tigers (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2022
    Article
  8. Unifying Virulence Evaluation inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  9. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Microorganisms · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Isolation and characterization ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. White-tailed deer (Parasitology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genetic diversity ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

J P DubeyUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Building 1001, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350, USA. Electronic address: Jitender.dubey@ars.usda.gov.
K Van WhyUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, Harrisburg, PA 17106-0827, USA.
S K VermaUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Building 1001, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350, USA.
S ChoudharyUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Building 1001, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350, USA.
O C H KwokUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Building 1001, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350, USA.
A KhanDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
M S BehinkeDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
L D SibleyDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
L R FerreiraUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Building 1001, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350, USA.
S OliveiraUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Building 1001, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350, USA.
M WeaverDepartment of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, Shippensburg University, Shippensburg, PA 17257, USA.
R StewartDepartment of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, Shippensburg University, Shippensburg, PA 17257, USA.
C SuDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-0845, USA.

Funding

MOLECULAR BASIS OF TOXOPLASMOSIS IN AIDS PATIENTSR01AI036629 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SIBLEY, L. DAVID · 1994 to 2013
$5.3M
Infectivity and Transmission of ToxoplasmosisR01AI059176 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SIBLEY, L. DAVID · 2004 to 2013
$3.9M
NIAID NIH HHS AI036629NIAID NIH HHS AI059176NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI036629NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI059176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies indicated the predominance of Toxoplasma gondii haplogroup 12 in wildlife in the USA. However, still little is known of the genetic diversity of this parasite circulating in wildlife. In the present study, we tested coyotes (Canis latrans), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and geese (Branta canadensis) from the state of Pennsylvania for T. gondii infection. Antibodies to T. gondii were found in 160 of 367 animals, including 92 (34.5%) of 266 coyotes, 49 (62.0%) of 79 white-tailed deer, 17 (85.0%) of 20 red fox, and two of two Canada geese tested by the modified agglutination test (cut off titer 1:25). Tissues from 105 seropositive animals were bioassayed in mice, and viable T. gondii was isolated from 29 animals, including 10 of 53 coyotes, 11 of 16 foxes, 7 of 49 deer, and one of one goose. DNA isolated from culture-derived tachyzoites of these isolates was characterized initially using multilocus PCR-RFLP markers. Nine genotypes were revealed, including ToxoDB PCR-RFLP #1 (4 isolates), #2 (2 isolates), #3 (4 isolates), #4 (6 isolates), #5 (4 isolates), #54 (1 isolate), #141 (1 isolate), #143 (1 isolate), and #216 (6 isolates), indicating high genetic diversity of T. gondii in wildlife in Pennsylvania. Pathogenicity of six T. gondii isolates (5 of #216 and #141) was determined in outbred Swiss Webster mice. Three of #216 and the #141 isolates were acute virulent to mice, and the other 2 #216 isolates were intermediate virulent. To determine the extent of genetic variation of these as well as a few recently reported virulent isolates from wildlife in North America, intron sequences were generated. Analysis of intron sequences and PCR-RFLP genotyping results indicated that the #216 isolates are likely derived from recombination of the clonal type I and III lineages. To determine if T. gondii virulence can be predicted by typing, we genotyped a collection of strains using PCR-RFLP markers for polymorphic genes ROP5, ROP16, ROP18 and GRA15, which are known to interact with host immune response. The results showed that there is an association of genotypes of ROP5 and ROP18 with mouse-virulence, however, additional gene(s) may also contribute to virulence in distinct T. gondii genotypes.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticAnimalsAnimals, WildAntibodies, ProtozoanDNA, ProtozoanGenetic VariationGenotypeMicePennsylvaniaPrevalenceToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis, AnimalAntibodies, ProtozoanDNA, ProtozoanGenotypingIsolationPennsylvaniaSeroprevalenceToxoplasma gondiiUSAWildlife

Identifiers

PMID24332401
PMCPMC4526132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.