Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24332165›Full record

ReviewBiophysical chemistry2014

Exploring the role of receptor flexibility in structure-based drug discovery.

Ferran Feixas, Steffen Lindert, William Sinko, J Andrew McCammon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structural bioinformatics for rational drug design.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Potent and Selective Human 5-HTJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Integrated Molecular Modeling and Machine Learning for Drug Design.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Discovery of Diverse Natural Products as Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 MJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ferran FeixasDeparment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States; Department of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States. Electronic address: ffeixas@ucsd.edu.
Steffen LindertDeparment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States; Department of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.
William SinkoDeparment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States; Department of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.
J Andrew McCammonDeparment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States; Department of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States; NSF Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, La Jolla, CA, United States; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.

Funding

YEAST ER MOLECULAR CHAPERONE TRANSLOCATION: GENOME DATABANK HOMOLOGSP41RR006009 · NCRR · MELLON PITTS CORPORATION (MPC CORP) · PI ROPELEWSKI, ALEXANDER J · 1990 to 2011
$22.0M
THEORY OF BIOMOLECULAR DIFFUSIONR01GM031749 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI HUBER, GARY ALEXANDER, MCCAMMON, JAMES ANDREW · 1985 to 2022
$7.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCRR NIH HHS P41 RR006009NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM031749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proper understanding of biomolecular recognition mechanisms that take place in a drug target is of paramount importance to improve the efficiency of drug discovery and development. The intrinsic dynamic character of proteins has a strong influence on biomolecular recognition mechanisms and models such as conformational selection have been widely used to account for this dynamic association process. However, conformational changes occurring in the receptor prior and upon association with other molecules are diverse and not obvious to predict when only a few structures of the receptor are available. In view of the prominent role of protein flexibility in ligand binding and its implications for drug discovery, it is of great interest to identify receptor conformations that play a major role in biomolecular recognition before starting rational drug design efforts. In this review, we discuss a number of recent advances in computer-aided drug discovery techniques that have been proposed to incorporate receptor flexibility into structure-based drug design. The allowance for receptor flexibility provided by computational techniques such as molecular dynamics simulations or enhanced sampling techniques helps to improve the accuracy of methods used to estimate binding affinities and, thus, such methods can contribute to the discovery of novel drug leads.

Indexed as

Computer-Aided DesignDrug DesignAnimalsHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsProteinsAccelerated molecular dynamicsAllosteryComputer-aided drug designConformational selectionMolecular dynamicsReceptor flexibility

Identifiers

PMID24332165
PMCPMC4459653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.