ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
Detection of attractors of large Boolean networks via exhaustive enumeration of appropriate subspaces of the state space.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing the analog computing power of regulatory networks with the Regulatory Network Machine.iScience · 2025Article
- Global stabilization of Boolean networks with applications to biomolecular network control.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring attractor bifurcations in Boolean networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Scale free topology as an effective feedback system.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Method for identification of sensitive nodes in Boolean models of biological networks.IET systems biology · 2018Article
- ASP-based method for the enumeration of attractors in non-deterministic synchronous and asynchronous multi-valued networks.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2017Article
- An efficient algorithm for identifying primary phenotype attractors of a large-scale Boolean network.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
- Qualitative dynamics semantics for SBGN process description.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
- Detecting small attractors of large Boolean networks by function-reduction-based strategy.IET systems biology · 2016Article
- Article
- An Efficient Steady-State Analysis Method for Large Boolean Networks with High Maximum Node Connectivity.PloS one · 2015Article
- Approximating Attractors of Boolean Networks by Iterative CTL Model Checking.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBoolean models are increasingly used to study biological signaling networks. In a Boolean network, nodes represent biological entities such as genes, proteins or protein complexes, and edges indicate activating or inhibiting influences of one node towards another. Depending on the input of activators or inhibitors, Boolean networks categorize nodes as either active or inactive. The formalism is appealing because for many biological relationships, we lack quantitative information about binding constants or kinetic parameters and can only rely on a qualitative description of the type "A activates (or inhibits) B". A central aim of Boolean network analysis is the determination of attractors (steady states and/or cycles). This problem is known to be computationally complex, its most important parameter being the number of network nodes. Various algorithms tackle it with considerable success. In this paper we present an algorithm, which extends the size of analyzable networks thanks to simple and intuitive arguments.
resultsWe present lnet, a software package which, in fully asynchronous updating mode and without any network reduction, detects the fixed states of Boolean networks with up to 150 nodes and a good part of any present cycles for networks with up to half the above number of nodes. The algorithm goes through a complete enumeration of the states of appropriately selected subspaces of the entire network state space. The size of these relevant subspaces is small compared to the full network state space, allowing the analysis of large networks. The subspaces scanned for the analyses of cycles are larger, reducing the size of accessible networks. Importantly, inherent in cycle detection is a classification scheme based on the number of non-frozen nodes of the cycle member states, with cycles characterized by fewer non-frozen nodes being easier to detect. It is further argued that these detectable cycles are also the biologically more important ones. Furthermore, lnet also provides standard Boolean analysis features such as node loop detection.
conclusionslnet is a software package that facilitates the analysis of large Boolean networks. Its intuitive approach helps to better understand the network in question.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.