Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24329933›Full record

ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2014

Neurosystems: brain rhythms and cognitive processing.

Jonathan Cannon, Michelle M McCarthy, Shane Lee, Jung Lee, Christoph Börgers, Miles A Whittington, Nancy Kopell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Δ9-THC Disrupts Gamma (γ)-Band Neural Oscillations in Humans.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Generalized Slowing of Resting-State Neural Oscillations in People With Schizophrenia.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan CannonDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, 111 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Michelle M McCarthy
Shane Lee
Jung Lee
Christoph Börgers
Miles A Whittington
Nancy Kopell

Funding

CRCNS: Gamma Rhythms and Cell AssembliesR01NS067199 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KOPELL, NANCY · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS 5R01NS067199NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS067199Wellcome Trust 098352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal rhythms are ubiquitous features of brain dynamics, and are highly correlated with cognitive processing. However, the relationship between the physiological mechanisms producing these rhythms and the functions associated with the rhythms remains mysterious. This article investigates the contributions of rhythms to basic cognitive computations (such as filtering signals by coherence and/or frequency) and to major cognitive functions (such as attention and multi-modal coordination). We offer support to the premise that the physiology underlying brain rhythms plays an essential role in how these rhythms facilitate some cognitive operations.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyAnimalsBrainCognitionHumansattentionbeta rhythmcoherence filteringfrequency filteringgamma rhythm

Identifiers

PMID24329933
PMCPMC4916881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.