Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24328651›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2014

The role of public health advocacy in achieving an outright ban on commercial tanning beds in Australia.

Craig A Sinclair, Jennifer Kay Makin, Anita Tang, Irena Brozek, Vanessa Rock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Assessing a ban on the use of UV tanning devices among adolescents in Ontario, Canada: first-year results.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. [Prevalence, risk groups, and reasons for sunbed use in Germany].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. More skin, more sun, more tan, more melanoma.American journal of public health · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Craig A SinclairCraig A. Sinclair is with the Prevention Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Victoria, Australia. Jennifer K. Makin is with the Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria. Anita Tang, Irena Brozek, and Vanessa Rock are with the Health Strategies Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Woolloomooloo, Australia.
Jennifer Kay Makin
Anita Tang
Irena Brozek
Vanessa Rock

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although many countries still face opposition to the legislation of artificial tanning beds, all Australian states and territories have announced a total ban on commercial tanning beds. A combination of epidemiological and policy-centered research, powerful personal stories, and the active advocacy of prominent academics, cancer organizations, and grassroots community campaigners contributed to the decisions to first legislate standards and then ban all commercial tanning beds. We have illustrated that incremental change can be an effective pathway to securing substantial public health reforms.

Indexed as

Consumer AdvocacyAustraliaBeauty CultureHumansPublic HealthSunbathingUltraviolet Rays

Identifiers

PMID24328651
PMCPMC3935699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.