Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24328642›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2014

Understanding the rural-urban differences in nonmedical prescription opioid use and abuse in the United States.

Katherine M Keyes, Magdalena Cerdá, Joanne E Brady, Jennifer R Havens, Sandro Galea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 221 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
221citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

221 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Socioenvironmental disasters and the dialectics of overdose mortality.The International journal on drug policy · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

161 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine M KeyesKatherine M. Keyes, Magdalena Cerdá, and Sandro Galea are with the Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY. Joanne E. Brady is with the Department of Epidemiology and the Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University. Jennifer R. Havens is with the Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington.
Magdalena Cerdá
Joanne E Brady
Jennifer R Havens
Sandro Galea

Funding

Examining the Impact of the Twin Epidemics of Methamphetamine and Opioid Use on Overdose, Risky Sex and Treatment Engagement among PWUD in Two Rural Appalachian CohortsR01DA033862 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Jennifer R Havens · 2012 to 2026
$6.9M
Columbia Injury Control Research CenterR49CE002096 · CE · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LI, GUOHUA · 2012 to 2018
$5.5M
Social networks and HIV risk among rural drug usersR01DA024598 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HAVENS, JENNIFER R · 2008 to 2012
$2.6M
Race, alcohol consumption and vehicle crashes: an epidemiologic paradoxK01AA021511 · NIAAA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KEYES, KATHERINE M. · 2013 to 2017
$904k
Trajectories of Substance Use and Comorbid Mental IllnessK01DA030449 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CERDA, MAGDALENA · 2011 to 2015
$897k
Effectiveness of Mandatory Prescription Drug MonitoringR21DA029670 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LI, GUOHUA · 2011 to 2012
$418k
ACL HHS R49CE002096NCIPC CDC HHS 1R49CE002096-01NCIPC CDC HHS R49 CE002096NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA021511NIAAA NIH HHS K01AA021511NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA030449NIDA NIH HHS K01DA030449-01NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024598NIDA NIH HHS R01DA024598NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033862NIDA NIH HHS R01DA033862NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA029670NIDA NIH HHS R21DA029670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonmedical prescription opioid misuse remains a growing public problem in need of action and is concentrated in areas of US states with large rural populations such as Kentucky, West Virginia, Alaska, and Oklahoma. We developed hypotheses regarding the influence of 4 factors: (1) greater opioid prescription in rural areas, creating availability from which illegal markets can arise; (2) an out-migration of young adults; (3) greater rural social and kinship network connections, which may facilitate drug diversion and distribution; and (4) economic stressors that may create vulnerability to drug use more generally. A systematic consideration of the contexts that create differences in availability, access, and preferences is critical to understanding how drug use context varies across geography.

Indexed as

Prescription DrugsEconomicsFamily RelationsHumansOpioid-Related DisordersPerceptionPrescription Drug DiversionPrevalenceRisk FactorsRural PopulationSocial EnvironmentSocial SupportUnited StatesUrban PopulationPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID24328642
PMCPMC3935688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.