Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24328148›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2014

Discrimination between adenocarcinoma and normal pancreatic ductal fluid by proteomic and glycomic analysis.

Mindy Porterfield, Peng Zhao, Haiyong Han, John Cunningham, Kazuhiro Aoki, Daniel D Von Hoff, Michael J Demeure, J Michael Pierce, Michael Tiemeyer, Lance Wells

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CSIE: cancer subtyping via inference and ensemble.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  12. Endotracheal tube mucus as a source of airway mucus for rheological study.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mindy PorterfieldComplex Carbohydrate Research Center, ‡Chemistry Department, and §Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia , Athens, Georgia 30602, United States.
Peng Zhao
Haiyong Han
John Cunningham
Kazuhiro Aoki
Daniel D Von Hoff
Michael J Demeure
J Michael Pierce
Michael Tiemeyer
Lance Wells
Translational Genomics Research Institute · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

TR&D1: Stem Cell and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Resources (Pages 116-134)P41GM103490 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI PIERCE, J. MICHAEL · 2012 to 2018
$13.7M
Tumor Glycomics Laboratory for Discovery of Pancreatic Cancer MarkersU01CA128454 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI PIERCE, J. MICHAEL · 2007 to 2017
$5.7M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA128454NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103490NIGMS NIH HHS P41GM103490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitive and specific biomarkers for pancreatic cancer are currently unavailable. The high mortality associated with adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic epithelium justifies the broadest possible search for new biomarkers that can facilitate early detection or monitor treatment efficacy. Protein glycosylation is altered in many cancers, leading many to propose that glycoproteomic changes may provide suitable biomarkers. In order to assess this possibility for pancreatic cancer, we have performed an in-depth LC-MS/MS analysis of the proteome and MS(n)-based characterization of the N-linked glycome of a small set of pancreatic ductal fluid obtained from normal, pancreatitis, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), and pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Our results identify a set of seven proteins that were consistently increased in cancer ductal fluid compared to normal (AMYP, PRSS1, GP2-1, CCDC132, REG1A, REG1B, and REG3A) and one protein that was consistently decreased (LIPR2). These proteins are all directly or indirectly associated with the secretory pathway in normal pancreatic cells. Validation of these changes in abundance by Western blotting revealed increased REG protein glycoform diversity in cancer. Characterization of the total N-linked glycome of normal, IPMN, and adenocarcinoma ductal fluid clustered samples into three discrete groups based on the prevalence of six dominant glycans. Within each group, the profiles of less prevalent glycans were able to distinguish normal from cancer on this small set of samples. Our results emphasize that individual variation in protein glycosylation must be considered when assessing the value of a glycoproteomic marker, but also indicate that glycosylation diversity across human subjects can be reduced to simpler clusters of individuals whose N-linked glycans share structural features.

Indexed as

Carbohydrate MetabolismGlycomicsProteomeAdenocarcinomaBody FluidsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalChromatography, Reverse-PhaseHumansPancreasPancreatitis-Associated ProteinsTandem Mass SpectrometryPancreatitis-Associated ProteinsProteomeREG3A protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24328148
PMCPMC3946306
OpenAlexW2022832778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.