Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24327758›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2014

Evaluation of WHO screening algorithm for the presumptive treatment of asymptomatic rectal gonorrhoea and chlamydia infections in at-risk MSM in Kenya.

Eduard J Sanders, Elizabeth Wahome, Haile Selassie Okuku, Alexander N Thiong'o, Adrian D Smith, Sarah Duncan, John Mwambi, Juma Shafi, R Scott McClelland, Susan M Graham

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sexual partner characteristics and incident rectalSexually transmitted infections · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Kenyan MSM: no longer a hidden population.AIDS (London, England) · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Eduard J SandersCentre for Geographic Medicine Research - Coast, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), , Kilifi, Kenya.
Elizabeth Wahome
Haile Selassie Okuku
Alexander N Thiong'o
Adrian D Smith
Sarah Duncan
John Mwambi
Juma Shafi
R Scott McClelland
Susan M Graham
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Nairobi · KEChurchill Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757Wellcome Trust 077092Wellcome Trust 092654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe WHO recommends that men who have sex with men (MSM) reporting unprotected receptive anal intercourse (RAI) and either multiple partners or a partner with a sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the past 6 months should be presumptively treated for asymptomatic rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections. We evaluated this recommendation in a cohort of 'high-risk' MSM in Coastal Kenya.

methodsWe assessed presence of genitourinary and rectal symptoms, and determined prevalence and 3-month incidence of rectal NG and CT infections. We performed nucleic acid amplification testing of urine and rectal swab samples collected from MSM followed prospectively, and assessed predictive values of the WHO algorithm at baseline screening.

resultsOf 244 MSM screened, 240 (98.4%) were asymptomatic, and 147 (61.3%) reported any RAI in the past 6 months. Among 85 (35.4%) asymptomatic MSM meeting criteria for the WHO presumptive treatment (PT) recommendation, we identified 20 with rectal infections (six NG, 12 CT and two NG-CT co-infections). Among 62 asymptomatic MSM who did not meet criteria, we identified seven who were infected. The sensitivity and specificity of the WHO algorithm were 74.1% (95% CI 53.7% to 88.9%) and 45.8% (95% CI 36.7% to 55.2%), respectively. The 3-month incidence of any rectal NG or CT infection in asymptomatic men reporting any RAI was 39.7 (95% CI 24.3 to 64.8) per 100 person-years.

conclusionsAbout one-third of asymptomatic MSM were eligible to receive PT for NG and CT infections. Among MSM who would qualify for PT of rectal STIs, the number needed to treat in order to treat one infection was four. Our results support the value of the WHO screening algorithm and recommended PT strategy in this population.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningAdultAlgorithmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisGonorrheaHomosexuality, MaleHumansKenyaMaleNeisseria gonorrhoeaeNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicPrevalenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsCHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATISMENNEISSERIA GONORRHOEAPUBLIC HEALTHTREATMENT

Identifiers

PMID24327758
PMCPMC3932748
OpenAlexW2139601429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.