Differences in breast cancer survival by race--reply.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Assessing racial disparities in disease outcomes of patients with high-risk, triple-negative breast cancer and residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy: a post-hoc analysis of the ECOG-ACRIN 1131 clinical trial.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025
   Trial
2. The association between antidepressants use and development of cognitive impairment among older women diagnosed with breast cancer.European geriatric medicine · 2020
   Article
3. Learning from social media: utilizing advanced data extraction techniques to understand barriers to breast cancer treatment.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2016
   Article
4. Treatment of Breast Cancer in the Elderly.Current oncology reports · 2015
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Characteristics associated with differences in survival among black and white women with breast cancer.2013
• Comment on
  Differences in breast cancer survival by race.2013

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as