ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2014
Prognostic value of FDG uptake in primary inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantification of metabolic tumor activity and burden in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: Is manual adjustment of semiautomatic gradient-based measurements necessary?Nuclear medicine communications · 2015Trial
- Prognostic impact of maximum standardized uptake value onThoracic cancer · 2021Article
- Article
- Optimal respiratory-gated [EJNMMI research · 2019Article
- [F-18] FDG-PET/CT parameters as predictors of outcome in inoperable NSCLC patients.Radiology and oncology · 2015Article
- Evaluation of 68Ga-labeled MG7 antibody: a targeted probe for PET/CT imaging of gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to further analyze the possible risk factors contributing to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). We retrospectively analyzed fifty patients between June 2007 and June 2010 with NSCLC who underwent positron emission tomography/computed tomography. We examined the correlation of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in FDG-PET of the primary tumor with other possible factors. The FDG uptake in the primary tumor was also compared for the different Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) staging groups and further correlation was analyzed. We divided the patients into two groups by the receiver operating characteristic curve of SUVmax: SUVmax < 5.45 (low-SUV) and ≥ 5.45 (high-SUV). The prognostic value of each parameter for OS and PFS was determined by using univariate and multivariate analysis. There were significant correlations between SUVmax and Tumor length, N stage, UICC stage, histologic differentiation (r = 0.298, 0.855, 0.345, 0.435). The comparison between the low- and high-SUV groups was evaluated. Statistically significant differences were found in the SUVmax of the primary tumors among different UICC staging groups, and the correlation between stages I-II and stages III-IV for OS and PFS was also statistically significant. Univariate analysis showed that performance status (PS-ZPS score), histologic differentiation, UICC stages, and SUVmax of the primary tumor were significantly associated with OS and PFS. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that histologic differentiation and SUVmax of primary tumor might be considered as significant predictive factors for OS and PFS in patients with NSCLC. Our results showed that there was a significant relationship between the SUVmax of the primary tumor and OS and PFS. FDG uptake by the primary tumor may be an independent outcome predictor for patients with NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24326983What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.