Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24326770›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of chemokine receptor CXCR4 overexpression in patients with esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Jingxun Wu, Xuan Wu, Wenhua Liang, Chunling Chen, Lingling Zheng, Hanxiang An

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Current Status ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Long noncoding RNA SPRY4-IT1 promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell proliferation, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  18. Regulation of CXCR4/AKT-signaling-induced cell invasion and tumor metastasis by RhoA, Rac-1, and Cdc42 in human esophageal cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. CXCR4 in breast cancer: oncogenic role and therapeutic targeting.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jingxun WuDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, 55 Zhenhai Road, Xiamen, Fujian, 361000, People's Republic of China.
Xuan Wu
Wenhua Liang
Chunling Chen
Lingling Zheng
Hanxiang An

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic significance of CXC chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) for survival of patients with esophageal cancer remains controversial. To investigate its expression impact on clinicopathological features and survival outcome, a meta-analysis was performed. A comprehensive search in the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (up to October 8, 2013) was performed for relevant studies using multiple search strategies. Correlation between CXCR4 expression and clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) was analyzed. A total of 1,055 patients with esophageal cancer from seven studies were included. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) which indicated CXCR4 expression was associated with tumor depth (OR = 0.35, confidence interval (CI) = 0.27-0.47, P < 0.00001), status of lymph node (OR = 0.36, CI = 0.21-0.61, P < 0.0002), TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) stage (OR = 0.38, CI = 0.25-0.56, P < 0.00001), and histological type (OR = 1.81, CI = 1.07-3.05, P = 0.03). Poor overall survival of esophageal cancer was found to be significantly related to CXCR4 overexpression (hazard ratio (HR) 1.49, 95% CI = 1.24-1.80, P < 0.0001), whereas combined ORs exhibited that CXCR4 expression has no correlation with gender or tumor differentiation. Based on the published studies, CXCR4 overexpression in patients with esophageal cancer indicated worse survival outcome and was associated with common clinicopathological poor prognostic factors.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosisPublication BiasReceptors, CXCR4CXCR4 protein, humanReceptors, CXCR4

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.