ReviewDer Radiologe2014
[Oncological imaging for therapy response assessment].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy, Safety, and Cost of Therapy of the Traditional Chinese Medicine, Catalpol, in Patients Following Surgical Resection for Locally Advanced Colon Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Trial
- Comparisons of Efficacy, Safety, and Cost of Chemotherapy Regimens FOLFOX4 and FOLFIRINOX in Rectal Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review illustrates different radiological methods for therapy response assessment in the field of oncological imaging. Unidimensional measurement of tumor size according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) is of utmost importance. The established RECIST definitions of changes in size are decisive for subdivision into the categories complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD), which are generally accepted as the concise characterization for therapy response. Problems with size-dependent response assessment occur particularly in targeted therapy and by phenomena, such as pseudoprogression. Several variants of functional imaging and their role in cancer imaging regarding practical requests are introduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.