ArticleComparative medicine2013
Contrast agents for quantitative microCT of lung tumors in mice.
Article in Comparative medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimized Contrast-Enhanced Micro-Computed Tomography for Simultaneous Imaging of the Ductus Arteriosus and Pulmonary Arteries During the Perinatal Transition.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- High resolution imaging of human development: shedding light on contrast agents.Neuroradiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Mouse lung automated segmentation tool for quantifying lung tumors after micro-computed tomography.PloS one · 2021Article
- Automated monitoring of respiratory rate as a novel humane endpoint: A refinement in mouse metastatic lung cancer models.PloS one · 2021Article
- X-ray-based virtual slicing of TB-infected lungs.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Early detection of pre-malignant lesions in a KRASDisease models & mechanisms · 2019Article
- A step towards valid detection and quantification of lung cancer volume in experimental mice with contrast agent-based X-ray microtomography.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Longitudinal in vivo microcomputed tomography of mouse lungs: No evidence for radiotoxicity.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification and quantitative evaluation of lung tumors in mouse models is challenging and an unmet need in preclinical arena. In this study, we developed a noninvasive contrast-enhanced microCT (μCT) method to longitudinally evaluate and quantitate lung tumors in mice. Commercially available μCT contrast agents were compared to determine the optimal agent for visualization of thoracic blood vessels and lung tumors in naïve mice and in non-small-cell lung cancer models. Compared with the saline control, iopamidol and iodinated lipid agents provided only marginal increases in contrast resolution. The inorganic nanoparticulate agent provided the best contrast and visualization of thoracic vascular structures; the density contrast was highest at 15 min after injection and was stable for more than 4 h. Differential contrast of the tumors, vascular structures, and thoracic air space by the nanoparticulate agent enabled identification of tumor margins and accurate quantification. μCT data correlated closely with traditional histologic measurements (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.995). Treatment of ELM4-ALK mice with crizotinib yielded 65% reduction in tumor size and thus demonstrated the utility of quantitative μCT in longitudinal preclinical trials. Overall and among the 3 agents we tested, the inorganic nanoparticulate product was the best commercially available contrast agent for visualization of thoracic blood vessels and lung tumors. Contrast-enhanced μCT imaging is an excellent noninvasive method for longitudinal evaluation during preclinical lung tumor studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24326223PMC3866987W2175182983What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.