Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24326041›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2013

Evaluation of ultra-deep targeted sequencing for personalized breast cancer care.

Olivier Harismendy, Richard B Schwab, Hakan Alakus, Shawn E Yost, Hiroko Matsui, Farnaz Hasteh, Anne M Wallace, Hannah L Park, Lisa Madlensky, Barbara Parker and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Genetic variants of prospectively demonstrated phenocopies inHereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2018
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Olivier Harismendy
Richard B Schwab
Hakan Alakus
Shawn E Yost
Hiroko Matsui
Farnaz Hasteh
Anne M Wallace
Hannah L Park
Lisa Madlensky
Barbara Parker
Philip M Carpenter
Kristen Jepsen
Hoda Anton-Culver
Kelly A Frazer
University of California, San Diego · USRady Children's Hospital-San Diego · USTH Köln - University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DIANE M SIMEONE · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Christine Hui · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
SAN DIEGO CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTEUL1RR031980 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S · 2010 to 2011
$14.0M
Biomarkers of Disease Progression in CLLR21CA152613 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FRAZER, KELLY A · 2010 to 2011
$367k
Identification of Somatic Mutations in Rare Subclones of Solid TumorsR21CA155615 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HARISMENDY, OLIVIER · 2011 to 2012
$283k
NCI NIH HHS 1R21CA152613-01NCI NIH HHS 1R21CA155615-01A1NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR031980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe increasing number of targeted therapies, together with a deeper understanding of cancer genetics and drug response, have prompted major healthcare centers to implement personalized treatment approaches relying on high-throughput tumor DNA sequencing. However, the optimal way to implement this transformative methodology is not yet clear. Current assays may miss important clinical information such as the mutation allelic fraction, the presence of sub-clones or chromosomal rearrangements, or the distinction between inherited variants and somatic mutations. Here, we present the evaluation of ultra-deep targeted sequencing (UDT-Seq) to generate and interpret the molecular profile of 38 breast cancer patients from two academic medical centers.

methodsWe sequenced 47 genes in matched germline and tumor DNA samples from 38 breast cancer patients. The selected genes, or the pathways they belong to, can be targeted by drugs or are important in familial cancer risk or drug metabolism.

resultsRelying on the added value of sequencing matched tumor and germline DNA and using a dedicated analysis, UDT-Seq has a high sensitivity to identify mutations in tumors with low malignant cell content. Applying UDT-Seq to matched tumor and germline specimens from the 38 patients resulted in a proposal for at least one targeted therapy for 22 patients, the identification of tumor sub-clones in 3 patients, the suggestion of potential adverse drug effects in 3 patients and a recommendation for genetic counseling for 2 patients.

conclusionOverall our study highlights the additional benefits of a sequencing strategy, which includes germline DNA and is optimized for heterogeneous tumor tissues.

Indexed as

MutationBreast NeoplasmsChromosome AberrationsDNA, NeoplasmFemaleGene DosageHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPrecision MedicineDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID24326041
PMCPMC3978701
OpenAlexW2133496872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.