ArticlePloS one2013
Forest loss and the biodiversity threshold: an evaluation considering species habitat requirements and the use of matrix habitats.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond unit-level certification: An operational agenda for biodiversity-positive tropical production landscapes.iScience · 2026Review
- Multilevel Impacts of Habitat Fragmentation on Plant Diversity and Structure in Urban Remnant Forests.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Host-Pathogen-Vector Continuum in a Changing Landscape: Potential Transmission Pathways forEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Differentiating spillover: an examination of cross-habitat movement in ecology spillover in ecology.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Review
- Response of soil bacteria on habitat-specialization and abundance gradient to different afforestation types.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- phylogatR: Phylogeographic data aggregation and repurposing.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Article
- Composition and structure of the helminth community of rodents in matrix habitat areas of the Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021Article
- Does stress mess with rodents' heads? Influence of habitat amount and genetic factors in mandible fluctuating asymmetry in South American water rats (Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Article
- Seedling recruitment under isolated trees in a tea plantation provides a template for forest restoration in eastern Africa.PloS one · 2021Article
- Habitat integrity drives Odonata diversity in Eucalyptus-dominated landscape.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2020Article
- Trait-based climate vulnerability of native rodents in southwestern Mexico.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Marked decline in forest-dependent small mammals following habitat loss and fragmentation in an Amazonian deforestation frontier.PloS one · 2020Article
- Hantavirus host assemblages and human disease in the Atlantic Forest.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019Article
- Small mammal responses to Amazonian forest islands are modulated by their forest dependence.Oecologia · 2018Article
- Article
- Impacts of deforestation on plant-pollinator networks assessed using an agent based model.PloS one · 2018Article
- Biodiversity thresholds in invertebrate communities: The responses of dung beetle subgroups to forest loss.PloS one · 2018Article
- Agricultural matrices affect ground ant assemblage composition inside forest fragments.PloS one · 2018Article
- Influence of vegetation area and edge length on mammals in urban woods.Animal cells and systems · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Habitat loss is the main driver of the current biodiversity crisis, a landscape-scale process that affects the survival of spatially-structured populations. Although it is well-established that species responses to habitat loss can be abrupt, the existence of a biodiversity threshold is still the cause of much controversy in the literature and would require that most species respond similarly to the loss of native vegetation. Here we test the existence of a biodiversity threshold, i.e. an abrupt decline in species richness, with habitat loss. We draw on a spatially-replicated dataset on Atlantic forest small mammals, consisting of 16 sampling sites divided between forests and matrix habitats in each of five 3600-ha landscapes (varying from 5% to 45% forest cover), and on an a priori classification of species into habitat requirement categories (forest specialists, habitat generalists and open-area specialists). Forest specialists declined abruptly below 30% of forest cover, and spillover to the matrix occurred only in more forested landscapes. Generalists responded positively to landscape heterogeneity, peaking at intermediary levels of forest cover. Open area specialists dominated the matrix and did not spillover to forests. As a result of these distinct responses, we observed a biodiversity threshold for the small mammal community below 30% forest cover, and a peak in species richness just above this threshold. Our results highlight that cross habitat spillover may be asymmetrical and contingent on landscape context, occurring mainly from forests to the matrix and only in more forested landscapes. Moreover, they indicate the potential for biodiversity thresholds in human-modified landscapes, and the importance of landscape heterogeneity to biodiversity. Since forest loss affected not only the conservation value of forest patches, but also the potential for biodiversity-mediated services in anthropogenic habitats, our work indicates the importance of proactive measures to avoid human-modified landscapes to cross this threshold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.