Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24324735›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Oct4/Sox2 binding sites contribute to maintaining hypomethylation of the maternal igf2/h19 imprinting control region.

David L Zimmerman, Craig S Boddy, Christopher S Schoenherr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. TET3 protects theiScience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cells · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Syndromic Disorders Caused by Disturbed Human ImprintingJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David L ZimmermanDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America ; Biology Department, College of the Ozarks, Point Lookout, Missouri, United States of America.
Craig S Boddy
Christopher S Schoenherr
College of the Ozarks · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Chromatin boundaries and genomic imprintingR01CA105017 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SCHOENHERR, CHRISTOPHER J · 2004 to 2008
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105017NCI NIH HHS R01-CA105017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central question in genomic imprinting is how parental-specific DNA methylation of imprinting control regions (ICR) is established during gametogenesis and maintained after fertilization. At the imprinted Igf2/H19 locus, CTCF binding maintains the unmethylated state of the maternal ICR after the blastocyst stage. In addition, evidence from Beckwith-Wiedemann patients and cultured mouse cells suggests that two Sox-Oct binding motifs within the Igf2/H19 ICR also participate in maintaining hypomethylation of the maternal allele. We found that the Sox and octamer elements from both Sox-Oct motifs were required to drive hypomethylation of integrated transgenes in mouse embryonic carcinoma cells. Oct4 and Sox2 showed cooperative binding to the Sox-Oct motifs, and both were present at the endogenous ICR. Using a mouse with mutations in the Oct4 binding sites, we found that maternally transmitted mutant ICRs acquired partial methylation in somatic tissues, but there was little effect on imprinted expression of H19 and Igf2. A subset of mature oocytes also showed partial methylation of the mutant ICR, which suggested that the Sox-Oct motifs provide some protection from methylation during oogenesis. The Sox-Oct motifs, however, were not required for erasure of paternal methylation in primordial germ cells, which indicated that the oocyte methylation was acquired post-natally. Maternally inherited mutant ICRs were unmethylated in blastocysts, which suggested that at least a portion of the methylation in somatic tissues occurred after implantation. These findings provide evidence that Sox-Oct motifs contribute to ICR hypomethylation in post-implantation embryos and maturing oocytes and link imprinted DNA methylation with key stem cell/germline transcription factors.

Indexed as

Genomic ImprintingAllelesAnimalsBinding SitesBlastocystCCCTC-Binding FactorDNA MethylationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGerm CellsInsulin-Like Growth Factor IIMaleMiceMutationNucleotide MotifsOctamer Transcription Factor-3CCCTC-Binding FactorCtcf protein, mouseH19 long non-coding RNAInsulin-Like Growth Factor IIOctamer Transcription Factor-3Pou5f1 protein, mouseRepressor ProteinsRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, MessengerSox2 protein, mouseSOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID24324735
PMCPMC3855764
OpenAlexW2129387898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.