Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24324621›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Reliable neuronal systems: the importance of heterogeneity.

Johannes Lengler, Florian Jug, Angelika Steger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Intrinsic neural diversity quenches the dynamic volatility of neural networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Systematic Framework for Olfactory Bulb Signal Transformations.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A dynamic architecture of life.F1000Research · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johannes LenglerInstitute of Theoretical Computer Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Florian Jug
Angelika Steger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For every engineer it goes without saying: in order to build a reliable system we need components that consistently behave precisely as they should. It is also well known that neurons, the building blocks of brains, do not satisfy this constraint. Even neurons of the same type come with huge variances in their properties and these properties also vary over time. Synapses, the connections between neurons, are highly unreliable in forwarding signals. In this paper we argue that both these fact add variance to neuronal processes, and that this variance is not a handicap of neural systems, but that instead predictable and reliable functional behavior of neural systems depends crucially on this variability. In particular, we show that higher variance allows a recurrently connected neural population to react more sensitively to incoming signals, and processes them faster and more energy efficient. This, for example, challenges the general assumption that the intrinsic variability of neurons in the brain is a defect that has to be overcome by synaptic plasticity in the process of learning.

Indexed as

Genetic HeterogeneityModels, Neurologicalalpha-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic AcidAnimalsBrainComputer SimulationExcitatory Postsynaptic Potentialsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansLearningNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPoisson DistributionReceptors, AMPAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartatealpha-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic Acidgamma-Aminobutyric AcidReceptors, AMPAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID24324621
PMCPMC3851464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.