Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24324546›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Systematic construction of kinetic models from genome-scale metabolic networks.

Natalie J Stanford, Timo Lubitz, Kieran Smallbone, Edda Klipp, Pedro Mendes, Wolfram Liebermeister

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multi-scale models of whole cells: progress and challenges.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Natalie J StanfordSchool of Computer Science, Manchester Centre for Integrative Systems Biology, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Timo Lubitz
Kieran Smallbone
Edda Klipp
Pedro Mendes
Wolfram Liebermeister
University of Manchester · GBHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

COPASI software for modeling and simulation of biochemical networksR01GM080219 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI HOOPS, STEFAN, MENDES, PEDRO · 2007 to 2019
$5.4M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilNIGMS NIH HHS GM080219NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quantitative effects of environmental and genetic perturbations on metabolism can be studied in silico using kinetic models. We present a strategy for large-scale model construction based on a logical layering of data such as reaction fluxes, metabolite concentrations, and kinetic constants. The resulting models contain realistic standard rate laws and plausible parameters, adhere to the laws of thermodynamics, and reproduce a predefined steady state. These features have not been simultaneously achieved by previous workflows. We demonstrate the advantages and limitations of the workflow by translating the yeast consensus metabolic network into a kinetic model. Despite crudely selected data, the model shows realistic control behaviour, a stable dynamic, and realistic response to perturbations in extracellular glucose concentrations. The paper concludes by outlining how new data can continuously be fed into the workflow and how iterative model building can assist in directing experiments.

Indexed as

GenomeKineticsMetabolic Networks and PathwaysThermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID24324546
PMCPMC3852239
OpenAlexW2000150815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.