Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24324160›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Transition state and ground state properties of the helix-coil transition in peptides deduced from high-pressure studies.

Sabine Neumaier, Maren Büttner, Annett Bachmann, Thomas Kiefhaber

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Microscopic nucleation and propagation rates of an alanine-based α-helix.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2017
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Role of solvation in pressure-induced helix stabilization.The Journal of chemical physics · 2014
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabine NeumaierMunich Centre for Integrated Protein Science and Chemistry Department, Technische Universität München, D-85747 Garching, Germany.
Maren Büttner
Annett Bachmann
Thomas Kiefhaber
Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volume changes associated with protein folding reactions contain valuable information about the folding mechanism and the nature of the transition state. However, meaningful interpretation of such data requires that overall volume changes be deconvoluted into individual contributions from different structural components. Here we focus on one type of structural element, the α-helix, and measure triplet-triplet energy transfer at high pressure to determine volume changes associated with the helix-coil transition. Our results reveal that the volume of a 21-amino-acid alanine-based peptide shrinks upon helix formation. Thus, helices, in contrast with native proteins, become more stable with increasing pressure, explaining the frequently observed helical structures in pressure-unfolded proteins. Both helix folding and unfolding become slower with increasing pressure. The volume changes associated with the addition of a single helical residue to a preexisting helix were obtained by comparing the experimental results with Monte Carlo simulations based on a kinetic linear Ising model. The reaction volume for adding a single residue to a helix is small and negative (-0.23 cm(3) per mol = -0.38 Å(3) per molecule) implying that intrahelical hydrogen bonds have a smaller volume than peptide-water hydrogen bonds. In contrast, the transition state has a larger volume than either the helical or the coil state, with activation volumes of 2.2 cm(3)/mol (3.7 Å(3) per molecule) for adding and 2.4 cm(3)/mol (4.0 Å(3) per molecule) for removing one residue. Thus, addition or removal of a helical residue proceeds through a transitory high-energy state with a large volume, possibly due to the presence of unsatisfied hydrogen bonds, although steric effects may also contribute.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularPressureProtein StabilityProtein Structure, SecondaryComputer SimulationMonte Carlo MethodPeptidesProtein UnfoldingPeptideshelix dynamicsprotein dynamicsprotein stability

Identifiers

PMID24324160
PMCPMC3876207
OpenAlexW2087459159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.