Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24323938›Full record

ReviewHuman mutation2014

Functional assays for analysis of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA2.

Lucia Guidugli, Aura Carreira, Sandrine M Caputo, Asa Ehlen, Alvaro Galli, Alvaro N A Monteiro, Susan L Neuhausen, Thomas V O Hansen, Fergus J Couch, Maaike P G Vreeswijk and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human mutation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular medicine reports · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Classification of BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Using an ACMG/AMP Model Incorporating a Homology-Directed Repair (HDR) Functional Assay.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Lucia GuidugliDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Aura Carreira
Sandrine M Caputo
Asa Ehlen
Alvaro Galli
Alvaro N A Monteiro
Susan L Neuhausen
Thomas V O Hansen
Fergus J Couch
Maaike P G Vreeswijk
ENIGMA consortium
Institut Curie · FRMayo Clinic · USBeckman Research InstituteCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCopenhagen University Hospital · DKIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITLeiden University Medical Center · NLMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
BRCA2 missense mutations and breast cancerR01CA116167 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense mutations and breast cancer riskU01CA116167 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH · 2013 to 2017
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA116167NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NCI NIH HHS R01 CA116167NCI NIH HHS U01 CA116167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Missense variants in the BRCA2 gene are routinely detected during clinical screening for pathogenic mutations in patients with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer. These subtle changes frequently remain of unknown clinical significance because of the lack of genetic information that may help establish a direct correlation with cancer predisposition. Therefore, alternative ways of predicting the pathogenicity of these variants are urgently needed. Since BRCA2 is a protein involved in important cellular mechanisms such as DNA repair, replication, and cell cycle control, functional assays have been developed that exploit these cellular activities to explore the impact of the variants on protein function. In this review, we summarize assays developed and currently utilized for studying missense variants in BRCA2. We specifically depict details of each assay, including variants of uncertain significance analyzed, and describe a validation set of (genetically) proven pathogenic and neutral missense variants to serve as a golden standard for the validation of each assay. Guidelines are proposed to enable implementation of laboratory-based methods to assess the impact of the variant on cancer risk.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA2Genetic TechniquesMutation, MissenseAnimalsBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsCell CycleDNA RepairFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationHumansOvarian NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2breast cancerfunctional analysisgenetic testingovarian cancervariants of uncertain significanceVUS

Identifiers

PMID24323938
PMCPMC3995136
OpenAlexW2123377668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.