ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2014
Decoding the components of dynamics in three-domain proteins.
Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterizing Aciniform Silk Repetitive Domain Backbone Dynamics and Hydrodynamic Modularity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we examine the feasibility and limitations of describing the motional behavior of three-domain proteins in which the domains are linearly connected. In addition to attempting the determination of the internal and overall reorientational correlation times, we investigate the existence of correlations in the motions between the three domains. Since in linearly arranged three-domain proteins, there are typically no experimental data that can directly report on motional correlation between the first and the third domain, we address this question by dynamics simulations. Two limiting cases occur: (1) for weak repulsive potentials and (2) when strong repulsive potentials are applied between sequential domains. The motions of the terminal domains become correlated in the case of strong interdomain repulsive potentials when these potentials do not allow the angle between the sequential domains to be smaller than about 60°. Using the model-free (MF) and extended MF formalisms of Lipari and Szabo, we find that the motional behavior can be separated into two components; the first component represents the concerted overall motion of the three domains, and the second describes the independent component of the motion of each individual domain. We find that this division of the motional behavior of the protein is maintained only when their timescales are distinct and can be made when the angles between sequential domains remain between 60° and 160°. In this work, we identify and quantify interdomain motional correlations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.