ArticleTranslational stroke research2011
Intravascular stem cell transplantation for stroke.
Article in Translational stroke research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of neural stem cells in the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Autologous Genetically Enriched Leucoconcentrate in the Preventive and Acute Phases of Stroke Treatment in a Mini-Pig Model.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Optimal Preclinical Conditions for Using Adult Human Multipotent Neural Cells in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Cell Therapy in Stroke-Cautious Steps Towards a Clinical Treatment.Translational stroke research · 2018Review
- Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging of transplanted stem cell fate in stroke.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2014Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is the third leading cause of death and the leading cause of adult disability in North America. Emphasis has been placed on developing treatments that reduce the devastating long-term impacts of this disease, and preclinical research on stem cell therapy has demonstrated promising results. However, questions about the optimal cell delivery method and timing of cell transplantation are not fully answered. Recent findings suggest that intravascular stem cell delivery is a safe and efficacious alternative to stereotactic cell injections. It also offers advantages should repeat treatments prove beneficial. Recent reports further suggest that intra-arterial injection results in a wider distribution of cells throughout the stroked hemisphere with a significantly greater cell engraftment compared to intravenous injection. In this review, we describe the benefits and potential risks associated with intravascular stem cell delivery and compare intra-arterial to intravenous cell transplantation methods. We discuss the importance of cell biodistribution and timing of transplantation in driving cell survival. We examine current proposed mechanisms involved in cell migration and functional recovery and discuss future directions for intravascular stem cell therapy research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.