Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24323521›Full record

ArticleTranslational stroke research2010

Preconditioning the human brain: practical considerations for proving cerebral protection.

Sebastian Koch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Translational stroke research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. The Janus Face of VEGF in Stroke.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  6. Ischemic Preconditioning in the Intensive Care Unit.Current treatment options in neurology · 2017
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Biomarkers for ischemic preconditioning: finding the responders.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2014
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian KochDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami, 1150 NW 14th Street, PAC, Suite#609, Miami, FL, 33136, USA, skoch@med.miami.edu.
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic preconditioning has evolved as one of the most powerful strategies for cerebral protection in laboratory models of ischemia. Translating the success of laboratory studies to human cerebral protection will necessitate an approximation of laboratory conditions. This would require a practical, easily implemented method of preconditioning and clinical settings in which cerebral ischemia is anticipated, thereby allowing cerebral preconditioning prior to ischemia onset. Remote limb ischemic preconditioning is readily instituted and used in several ongoing cardiac studies for ischemic myocardial protection. It is a potentially promising intervention for brain protection as well. Suitable clinical settings, in which a preliminary study of ischemic preconditioning in neurological disorders appears feasible, include carotid endarterectomy or stenting, cardiac surgery, and subarachnoid hemorrhage with the accompanying risk of vasospasm. These are settings, in which there is substantial risk of brain ischemia, which occurs over a short and predictable period, allowing for preconditioning to be implemented prior to ischemia onset.

Identifiers

PMID24323521
OpenAlexW2052258082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.