ArticleInternational orthopaedics2014
Ten year results of the collum femoris preserving total hip replacement: a prospective cohort study of seventy five patients.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Similar clinical results and early subsidence between the Collum Femoris Preserving and the Corail stem: a randomized radiostereometric study of 77 hips with 2 years' follow-up.Acta orthopaedica · 2019Trial
- The loading patterns of a short femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty: gait analysis at increasing walking speeds and inclines.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Is Collum Femoris Preserving Stem (CFP) an Epiphyseal-Stabilized Prosthesis? A Long-Term Single-Center Series Follow Up of 705 Cases.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Mid- to long-term clinical and radiological assessment of a short, titanium, porous plasma-splayed flat-tapered cementless femoral stem: An 8- to 12-year follow-up study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty in patients older than 75 years: is it feasible?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Prospective evaluation of clinical and radiographic 10-year results of Fitmore short-stem total hip arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Biomechanical Properties of Bionic Collum Femoris Preserving Hip Prosthesis: A Finite Element Analysis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Greater increase in femoral offset with use of collum femoris-preserving stem than Tri-Lock stem in primary total hip arthroplasty.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Mid-term results of a new-generation calcar-guided short stem in THA: clinical and radiological 5-year follow-up of 216 cases.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2019Article
- Fifty-six percent of proximal femoral cortical hypertrophies 6 to 10 years after Total hip arthroplasty with a short Cementless curved hip stem - a cause for concern?BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Article
- Long-term follow-up of 1217 consecutive short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA): a retrospective single-center experience.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2018Article
- Uncemented short stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: The state of the art.EFORT open reviews · 2018Article
- What is the fate of the neck after a collum femoris preserving prosthesis? a nineteen years single center experience.International orthopaedics · 2017Article
- CORR InsightsClinical orthopaedics and related research · 2017Article
- Two- to 4-Year Followup of a Short Stem THA Construct: Excellent Fixation, Thigh Pain a Concern.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe collum femoris preserving (CFP) uncemented prosthesis has a bone-preserving, high subcapital neck resection and a short anatomical stem. The ideal arthroplasty option in the younger, active patient is a subject of some debate. We evaluated midterm outcomes of the CFP in this patient population.
methodsA prospective, consecutive cohort of 75 CFP total hip replacement (THR) patients with a mean age of 52 years was followed for a mean of 9.3 years. Patients were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and activity levels using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score. Radiographs were evaluated for evidence of loosening. Survivorship was calculated with an endpoint of revision for aseptic loosening or radiographic evidence of loosening.
resultsMean HHS improved from a mean of 50 pre-operatively to 91 (p < 0.001) postoperatively. Mean pain score was 1, mean patient satisfaction was 9 and mean UCLA score was 6. Two acetabular components were revised for aseptic loosening; no stem required revision. Radiographically, no cases had evidence of loosening. Survivorship was 96.8 % for the acetabular component and 100 % for the stem at ten years. Three patients died from unrelated causes, and five were lost to follow-up.
conclusionsBone-preserving hip replacement has increased in popularity as hip replacement in younger and more active individuals increases. The CFP prosthesis has excellent midterm clinical function and survival and provides high levels of satisfaction in young patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.