ReviewTranslational stroke research2013
Moving towards preconditioning for neurological disorders: are we ready for clinical trials?
Review in Translational stroke research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ischemic conditioning-induced endogenous brain protection: Applications pre-, per- or post-stroke.Experimental neurology · 2015Review
- Remote limb ischemic conditioning enhances motor learning in healthy humans.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Hyperbaric oxygen preconditioning attenuates hemorrhagic transformation through increasing PPARγ in hyperglycemic MCAO rats.Experimental neurology · 2015Article
- Full steam ahead with remote ischemic conditioning for stroke.Translational stroke research · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The large volume of preclinical investigations begets the question of whether to proceed with clinical trials in preconditioning for neurological disorders, particularly for treatment of human cerebral ischemia. This important question was discussed during the 2nd Translational Preconditioning Meeting held at the University of Miami. While recommendations for proceeding to clinical trials have been devised in other fields of stroke therapy, such as neuroprotection, no such guidelines exist for preconditioning. During the discussion, the general opinion was to proceed with clinical preconditioning trials, with the understanding that initial trials be exploratory in nature and focus on the development of biomarkers, assessing the elicitability of the preconditioning response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24323187What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.