Proceedings of the 2nd translational preconditioning meeting Miami.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A critical review of mechanisms regulating remote preconditioning-induced brain protection.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2015
   Review
2. Ischemic conditioning-induced endogenous brain protection: Applications pre-, per- or post-stroke.Experimental neurology · 2015
   Review
3. Full steam ahead with remote ischemic conditioning for stroke.Translational stroke research · 2014
   Article
4. Biomarkers for ischemic preconditioning: finding the responders.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2014
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as