Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24322891›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2014

c-FOS suppresses ovarian cancer progression by changing adhesion.

L Oliveira-Ferrer, K Rößler, V Haustein, C Schröder, D Wicklein, D Maltseva, N Khaustova, T Samatov, A Tonevitsky, S Mahner and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L Oliveira-FerrerDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
K RößlerDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
V HausteinDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
C SchröderDepartment of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
D WickleinDepartment of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
D MaltsevaSRC Bioclinicum, Ugreshskaya Street 2/85, Moscow 115088, Russia.
N KhaustovaSRC Bioclinicum, Ugreshskaya Street 2/85, Moscow 115088, Russia.
T SamatovSRC Bioclinicum, Ugreshskaya Street 2/85, Moscow 115088, Russia.
A TonevitskyInstitute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, Baltijskaya Street 8, Moscow 125315, Russia.
S MahnerDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
F JänickeDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
U SchumacherDepartment of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
K Milde-LangoschDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Research Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundC-Fos was initially described as oncogene, but was associated with favourable prognosis in ovarian cancer (OvCa) patients. The molecular and functional aspects underlying this effect are still unknown.

methodsUsing stable transfectants of SKOV3 and OVCAR8 cells, proliferation, migration, invasion and apoptotic potential of c-FOS-overexpressing clones and controls were compared. Adherence to components of the extracellular matrix was analysed in static assays, and adhesion to E-selectin, endothelial and mesothelial cells in dynamic flow assays. The effect of c-FOS in vivo was studied after intraperitoneal injection of SKOV3 clones into SCID mice, and changes in gene expression were determined by microarray analysis.

resultsTumour growth after injection into SCID mice was strongly delayed by c-FOS overexpression, with reduction of lung metastases and circulating tumour cells. In vitro, c-FOS had only weak influence on proliferation and migration, but was strongly pro-apoptotic. Adhesion to components of the extracellular matrix (collagen I, IV) and to E-selectin, endothelial and mesothelial cells was significantly reduced in c-FOS-overexpressing OvCa cells. This corresponds to deregulation of adhesion proteins and glycosylation enzymes in microarray analysis.

conclusionIn addition to its known pro-apoptotic effect, c-FOS might influence OvCa progression by changing the adhesion of OvCa cells to peritoneal surfaces.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCarcinogenesisCell AdhesionCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationDisease ProgressionExtracellular MatrixFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiceNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingOvarian NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos

Identifiers

PMID24322891
PMCPMC3915133
OpenAlexW2024272840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.