Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24322344›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2014

A comparative cytogenetic study of miscarriages after IVF and natural conception in women aged under and over 35 years.

Anna A Pendina, Olga A Efimova, Olga G Chiryaeva, Andrei V Tikhonov, Lubov' I Petrova, Vera S Dudkina, Natalia A Sadik, Irina D Fedorova, Ilona A Galembo, Tatyana V Kuznetzova and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna A PendinaD.O.Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mendeleevskaya line, 3, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Olga A Efimova
Olga G Chiryaeva
Andrei V Tikhonov
Lubov' I Petrova
Vera S Dudkina
Natalia A Sadik
Irina D Fedorova
Ilona A Galembo
Tatyana V Kuznetzova
Alexander M Gzgzyan
Vladislav S Baranov
Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology named after D.O. Ott · RUResearch Centre for Medical Genetics · RUSt Petersburg University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the frequency and the spectrum of karyotype abnormality in the first trimester miscarriages in women aged under and over 35 years, who conceived naturally (NC) and who conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF).

methodsComparative analysis of cytogenetic data obtained by karyotyping of miscarriages in patients who conceived naturally, and who conceived through IVF. Patients were subcategorized by their age: <35 years (NC, n = 173; IVF, n = 108) and ≥ 35 years (NC, n = 107; IVF, n = 111).

resultsA total of 499 miscarriage karyotypes was analyzed. The spectrum and the relative proportions of different cytogenetic categories in karyotypically abnormal miscarriages differed neither between the NC and IVF patients aged <35 years, nor between the NC and IVF patients aged ≥ 35 years. In the patients aged <35 years, the incidence of abnormal miscarriage karyotype was lower in the IVF group (37.04 % vs 62.43%). In the patients aged ≥ 35 years, the incidence of miscarriages with cytogenetic pathology did not differ between the NC and the IVF group (75.70 % vs 58.56%). The lowest frequency of karyotypically abnormal miscarriages (29.82%) was detected in the young IVF-treated patients at <7 weeks of gestation.

conclusionsIVF does not increase the risk of a pregnancy loss because of abnormal embryonic karyotype, nor does it increase the preponderance for any specific type of cytogenetic abnormality in both patients aged under and over 35 years. In young IVF-treated women early pregnancy loss is generally caused by non-cytogenetic factors. Identification of a cytogenetically normal spontaneous abortion is clinically significant and reinforces the importance of developing an appropriate diagnosis and treatment strategies for IVF patients in order to reduce the risk of euploid pregnancy loss.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAdultCytogenetic AnalysisFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansKaryotypingMaternal AgeMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24322344
PMCPMC3933595
OpenAlexW1976898212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.