ArticleAnnals of vascular surgery2014
Carotid endarterectomy national trends over a decade: does sex matter?
Article in Annals of vascular surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta- analysis and meta-regression analysis of the associations between sex and the operative outcomes of carotid endarterectomy.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2015Pooled it
- Risk of Inhospital Stroke or Death Is Associated With Age But Not Sex in Patients Treated With Carotid Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic or Symptomatic Stenosis in Routine Practice: Secondary Data Analysis of the Nationwide German Statutory Quality Assurance Database From 2009 to 2014.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Trial
- A Nationwide Analysis in France on Sex Difference and Outcomes Following Carotid Intervention in Asymptomatic Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Asymptomatic Females Are at Higher Risk for Perioperative TIA/Stroke and Males Are at Higher Risk for Long-Term Mortality after Carotid Artery Stenting: A Vascular Quality Initiative Analysis.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2024Article
- Extra-Cranial Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Objective Analysis of the Available Evidence.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Concepts and Practice Patterns.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective was to evaluate the difference in timing (if any) of in-hospital carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or outcomes of CEA based on sex among men and women hospitalized for carotid artery disease.
methodsThis was a retrospective cross-sectional study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database. All patients from 2000-2009 who underwent CEA during their hospitalization were examined. International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision codes were used to identify patients who underwent CEA during hospitalization, stratify asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, determine time in days from admission to CEA, and examine in-hospital complications, including perioperative stroke, cardiac events, and death. Statistical analysis was performed with chi-squared and t-tests. Linear and logistic regression models were used to evaluate relationships between sex and outcomes. The main outcome measures were time from admission to surgery, in-hospital mortality, complications, mean duration of stay, and discharge disposition.
resultsTwo hundred twenty-one thousand two hundred fifty three patients underwent CEA during hospitalization. More than 9% (9.2%) had symptomatic carotid artery disease. Among symptomatic patients, bivariate analysis found that women had a longer mean time from admission to surgery (2.8 vs. 2.6 days; P < 0.001) and a longer duration of hospital stay (6.4 vs. 5.9 days; P < 0.001) than their male counterparts. However, there was no difference between men and women with regard to rates of perioperative stroke, cardiac complications, myocardial infarction, or death. Among asymptomatic patients, women had a longer mean time from admission to surgery (0.53 vs. 0.48 days; P < 0.001) and a trend toward increased perioperative stroke (0.6% vs. 0.5%; P = 0.06), but a lower rate of cardiac complications (1.5% vs. 1.7%; P = 0.01) and in-hospital mortality (0.26% vs. 0.31%; P = 0.05). However, on multivariable analysis adjusting for differences in age, elective status, insurance, race, hospital location, hospital region, and hospital teaching status, there was no sex disparity in time from admission to surgery, regardless of symptomatic status. In addition, asymptomatic women were less likely than men to have a cardiac complication (odds ratio [OR]: 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.97) or in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.70-0.98). Symptomatic women were also less likely than men to have a cardiac complication (OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.63-0.97).
conclusionsIn this decade-long national population-based study of hospitalized patients undergoing CEA, women had lower perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality rates than men. After adjusting for patient, clinical, and hospital factors, there is no discernible difference in timing of CEA based on sex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.