Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24321226›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology2014

Molecular and metabolic pattern classification for detection of brain glioma progression.

Farzin Imani, Fernando E Boada, Frank S Lieberman, Denise K Davis, James M Mountz

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Neuro-oncology practice · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Pseudoprogression of brain tumors.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2018
    Article
  12. An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2017
    Review
  13. 2D-QSAR and 3D-QSAR Analyses for EGFR Inhibitors.BioMed research international · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Choline metabolism-based molecular diagnosis of cancer: an update.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Farzin ImaniDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA, United States. Electronic address: imanif@upmc.edu.
Fernando E BoadaDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA, United States.
Frank S LiebermanDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA, United States.
Denise K DavisDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA, United States.
James M MountzDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA, United States.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

Quantitative Biomarker Imaging for Early Therapy Response Assessment in CancerU01CA140230 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MOUNTZ, JAMES M. · 2009 to 2013
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA140230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe ability to differentiate between brain tumor progression and radiation therapy induced necrosis is critical for appropriate patient management. In order to improve the differential diagnosis, we combined fluorine-18 2-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET), proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) and histological data to develop a multi-parametric machine-learning model.

methodsWe enrolled twelve post-therapy patients with grade 2 and 3 gliomas that were suspicious of tumor progression. All patients underwent (18)F-FDG PET and (1)H MRS. Maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the tumors and reference regions were obtained. Multiple 2D maps of choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), and N-acetylaspartate (NAA) of the tumors were generated. A support vector machine (SVM) learning model was established to take imaging biomarkers and histological data as input vectors. A combination of clinical follow-up and multiple sequential MRI studies served as the basis for assessing the clinical outcome. All vector combinations were evaluated for diagnostic accuracy and cross validation. The optimal cutoff value of individual parameters was calculated using Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots.

resultsThe SVM and ROC analyses both demonstrated that SUVmax of the lesion was the most significant single diagnostic parameter (75% accuracy) followed by Cho concentration (67% accuracy). SVM analysis of all paired parameters showed SUVmax and Cho concentration in combination could achieve 83% accuracy. SUVmax of the lesion paired with SUVmax of the white matter as well as the tumor Cho paired with the tumor Cr both showed 83% accuracy. These were the most significant paired diagnostic parameters of either modality. Combining all four parameters did not improve the results. However, addition of two more parameters, Cho and Cr of brain parenchyma contralateral to the tumor, increased the accuracy to 92%.

conclusionThis study suggests that SVM models may improve detection of glioma progression more accurately than single parametric imaging methods. RESEARCH SUPPORT: National Cancer Institute, Cancer Center Support Grant Supplement Award, Imaging Response Assessment Teams.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18GliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleMiddle AgedMolecular ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyProtonsRadiopharmaceuticalsBiomarkers, TumorFluorodeoxyglucose F18ProtonsRadiopharmaceuticals(18)F-FDG PET(1)H MRSGliomaSupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID24321226
PMCPMC3923608
OpenAlexW2159398494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.