ArticleEuropean journal of radiology2014
Molecular and metabolic pattern classification for detection of brain glioma progression.
Article in European journal of radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence algorithms for differentiating pseudoprogression from true progression in high-grade gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Comprehensive brain tumour concealment utilizing peak valley filtering and deeplab segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fast Hadamard-Encoded 7T Spectroscopic Imaging of Human Brain.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of glioma pseudoprogression identification with positron emission tomography imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence Based on Medical Imaging in Glioma: Current State and Future Challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Big Data to Knowledge: Application of Machine Learning to Predictive Modeling of Therapeutic Response in Cancer.Current genomics · 2021Review
- Review
- Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Article
- Machine learning studies on major brain diseases: 5-year trends of 2014-2018.Japanese journal of radiology · 2019Review
- Pseudoprogression of brain tumors.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2018Article
- An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2017Review
- 2D-QSAR and 3D-QSAR Analyses for EGFR Inhibitors.BioMed research international · 2017Article
- Positron emission tomography of high-grade gliomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2016Review
- Choline metabolism-based molecular diagnosis of cancer: an update.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2015Review
- Multiparametric radiomic tissue signature and machine learning for distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumor progression after stereotactic radiosurgery.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe ability to differentiate between brain tumor progression and radiation therapy induced necrosis is critical for appropriate patient management. In order to improve the differential diagnosis, we combined fluorine-18 2-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET), proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) and histological data to develop a multi-parametric machine-learning model.
methodsWe enrolled twelve post-therapy patients with grade 2 and 3 gliomas that were suspicious of tumor progression. All patients underwent (18)F-FDG PET and (1)H MRS. Maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the tumors and reference regions were obtained. Multiple 2D maps of choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), and N-acetylaspartate (NAA) of the tumors were generated. A support vector machine (SVM) learning model was established to take imaging biomarkers and histological data as input vectors. A combination of clinical follow-up and multiple sequential MRI studies served as the basis for assessing the clinical outcome. All vector combinations were evaluated for diagnostic accuracy and cross validation. The optimal cutoff value of individual parameters was calculated using Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots.
resultsThe SVM and ROC analyses both demonstrated that SUVmax of the lesion was the most significant single diagnostic parameter (75% accuracy) followed by Cho concentration (67% accuracy). SVM analysis of all paired parameters showed SUVmax and Cho concentration in combination could achieve 83% accuracy. SUVmax of the lesion paired with SUVmax of the white matter as well as the tumor Cho paired with the tumor Cr both showed 83% accuracy. These were the most significant paired diagnostic parameters of either modality. Combining all four parameters did not improve the results. However, addition of two more parameters, Cho and Cr of brain parenchyma contralateral to the tumor, increased the accuracy to 92%.
conclusionThis study suggests that SVM models may improve detection of glioma progression more accurately than single parametric imaging methods. RESEARCH SUPPORT: National Cancer Institute, Cancer Center Support Grant Supplement Award, Imaging Response Assessment Teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.