Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24321141›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2014

Diagnosing ocular surface squamous neoplasia in East Africa: case-control study of clinical and in vivo confocal microscopy assessment.

Marie B Nguena, Jan G van den Tweel, William Makupa, Victor H Hu, Helen A Weiss, Stephen Gichuhi, Matthew J Burton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Enhanced Imaging of Ocular Surface Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The Management of Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia (OSSN).International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. The role of imaging technologies for ocular surface tumors.Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Marie B NguenaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Jan G van den TweelDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
William MakupaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.
Victor H HuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania; International Centre for Eye Health, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Helen A WeissDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen GichuhiInternational Centre for Eye Health, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Matthew J BurtonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania; International Centre for Eye Health, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: matthew.burton@lshtm.ac.uk.
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1Wellcome Trust 080741/Z/06/ZWellcome Trust 98481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the reliability of clinical examination and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in distinguishing ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) from benign conjunctival lesions.

designCase-control study.

participantsSixty individuals with conjunctival lesions (OSSN and benign) and 60 age-matched controls with normal conjunctiva presenting to Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania.

methodsParticipants were examined and photographed, and IVCM was performed. Patients with conjunctival lesions were offered excisional biopsy with histopathology and a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test. The IVCM images were read masked to the clinical appearance and pathology results. Images were graded for several specific features and given an overall categorization (normal, benign, or malignant). A group of 8 ophthalmologists were shown photographs of conjunctival lesions and asked to independently classify as OSSN or benign.

main outcome measuresComparison of the histopathology diagnosis with the clinical and IVCM diagnosis.

resultsFifty-two cases underwent excisional biopsy with histopathology; 34 were on the OSSN spectrum, 17 were benign, and 1 was lymphoma. The cases and controls had comparable demographic profiles. Human immunodeficiency syndrome infection was more common in OSSN compared with benign cases (58.8% vs. 5.6%; odds ratio, 24.3, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-204; P = 0.003). Clinically, OSSN lesions more frequently exhibited feeder vessels and tended to have more leukoplakia and a gelatinous appearance. Overall, the ophthalmologists showed moderate agreement with the histology result (average kappa = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36-0.64). The masked grading of IVCM images reliably distinguished normal conjunctiva. However, IVCM was unable to reliably distinguish between benign lesions and OSSN because of an overlap in their appearance (kappa = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32-0.57). No single feature was significantly more frequent in OSSN compared with benign lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of IVCM for distinguishing OSSN from benign conjunctival lesions were 38.5% and 66.7%, respectively.

conclusionsIn East Africa, conjunctival pathology is relatively common and can present significant diagnostic challenges for the clinician. In this study, neither clinical examination nor IVCM was found to reliably distinguish OSSN from benign conjunctival pathology because of an overlap in the features of these groups. Therefore, IVCM cannot currently replace histopathology, and management decisions should continue to rely on careful clinical assessment supported by histopathology as indicated.

Indexed as

Microscopy, ConfocalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Squamous CellCase-Control StudiesConjunctival NeoplasmsEye Infections, ViralFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID24321141
PMCPMC3901930
OpenAlexW1522836851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.