Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24320616›Full record

ReviewGenes, brain, and behavior2014

Beyond modules and hubs: the potential of gene coexpression networks for investigating molecular mechanisms of complex brain disorders.

C Gaiteri, Y Ding, B French, G C Tseng, E Sibille

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Copula modeling of gene coexpression in single-cell RNA sequencing data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Telomere-Related Gene Networks in the Ovary Shift Across Environmental Factors.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C GaiteriModeling, Analysis and Theory Group, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Y Ding
B French
G C Tseng
E Sibille

Funding

Transcriptome analysis in major depressionR01MH077159 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MCCLUNG, COLLEEN A, SIBILLE, ETIENNE L · 2007 to 2015
$3.2M
Molecular Aging of the Human Brain: Genetic Modulation and Functional OutcomesR01MH093723 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SIBILLE, ETIENNE L · 2011 to 2015
$2.6M
Molecular characterization of a corticolimbic network in depressionK02MH084060 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SIBILLE, ETIENNE L · 2009 to 2013
$589k
NIMH NIH HHS K02 MH084060NIMH NIH HHS MH084060NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077159NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a research environment dominated by reductionist approaches to brain disease mechanisms, gene network analysis provides a complementary framework in which to tackle the complex dysregulations that occur in neuropsychiatric and other neurological disorders. Gene-gene expression correlations are a common source of molecular networks because they can be extracted from high-dimensional disease data and encapsulate the activity of multiple regulatory systems. However, the analysis of gene coexpression patterns is often treated as a mechanistic black box, in which looming 'hub genes' direct cellular networks, and where other features are obscured. By examining the biophysical bases of coexpression and gene regulatory changes that occur in disease, recent studies suggest it is possible to use coexpression networks as a multi-omic screening procedure to generate novel hypotheses for disease mechanisms. Because technical processing steps can affect the outcome and interpretation of coexpression networks, we examine the assumptions and alternatives to common patterns of coexpression analysis and discuss additional topics such as acceptable datasets for coexpression analysis, the robust identification of modules, disease-related prioritization of genes and molecular systems and network meta-analysis. To accelerate coexpression research beyond modules and hubs, we highlight some emerging directions for coexpression network research that are especially relevant to complex brain disease, including the centrality-lethality relationship, integration with machine learning approaches and network pharmacology.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksTranscription, GeneticAnimalsHumansNervous System DiseasesCoexpressioncomplex diseasescoregulationdepressiongenehubmodulenetworkpost-mortemregulatory networksmall-worldtranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID24320616
PMCPMC3896950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.