ArticleMedical physics2013
Automated fibroglandular tissue segmentation and volumetric density estimation in breast MRI using an atlas-aided fuzzy C-means method.
Article in Medical physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.Academic radiology · 2019Pooled it
- The Dose-Response Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Body Composition and Breast Tissue among Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer: A Randomized Trial.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2016Trial
- Racial differences in quantitative background parenchymal enhancement on breast magnetic resonance imaging.Cancer · 2025Article
- Impact of menopause and age on breast density and background parenchymal enhancement in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- The top 100 most-cited articles on artificial intelligence in breast radiology: a bibliometric analysis.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- A publicly available deep learning model and dataset for segmentation of breast, fibroglandular tissue, and vessels in breast MRI.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Obesity and metabolic dysfunction correlate with background parenchymal enhancement in premenopausal women.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2023Article
- Fully automated breast segmentation on spiral breast computed tomography images.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Proton density water fraction as a reproducible MR-based measurement of breast density.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Novelty detection for metabolic dynamics established on breast cancer tissue using 2D NMR TOCSY spectra.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Quantitative Measures of Background Parenchymal Enhancement Predict Breast Cancer Risk.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2021Article
- Vascularity and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2021Review
- Fully automatic quantification of fibroglandular tissue and background parenchymal enhancement with accurate implementation for axial and sagittal breast MRI protocols.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Volumetric breast density estimation on MRI using explainable deep learning regression.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Machine learning in breast MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020Review
- Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast tissue composition: a longitudinal mammographic study with automated volumetric measurement.European radiology · 2020Article
- Automated deep learning method for whole-breast segmentation in diffusion-weighted breast MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020Article
- Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: A comprehensive review.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020Review
- Current and Emerging Magnetic Resonance-Based Techniques for Breast Cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Review
- Automatic Breast and Fibroglandular Tissue Segmentation in Breast MRI Using Deep Learning by a Fully-Convolutional Residual Neural Network U-Net.Academic radiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBreast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in the clinical management of breast cancer. Studies suggest that the relative amount of fibroglandular (i.e., dense) tissue in the breast as quantified in MR images can be predictive of the risk for developing breast cancer, especially for high-risk women. Automated segmentation of the fibroglandular tissue and volumetric density estimation in breast MRI could therefore be useful for breast cancer risk assessment.
methodsIn this work the authors develop and validate a fully automated segmentation algorithm, namely, an atlas-aided fuzzy C-means (FCM-Atlas) method, to estimate the volumetric amount of fibroglandular tissue in breast MRI. The FCM-Atlas is a 2D segmentation method working on a slice-by-slice basis. FCM clustering is first applied to the intensity space of each 2D MR slice to produce an initial voxelwise likelihood map of fibroglandular tissue. Then a prior learned fibroglandular tissue likelihood atlas is incorporated to refine the initial FCM likelihood map to achieve enhanced segmentation, from which the absolute volume of the fibroglandular tissue (|FGT|) and the relative amount (i.e., percentage) of the |FGT| relative to the whole breast volume (FGT%) are computed. The authors' method is evaluated by a representative dataset of 60 3D bilateral breast MRI scans (120 breasts) that span the full breast density range of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. The automated segmentation is compared to manual segmentation obtained by two experienced breast imaging radiologists. Segmentation performance is assessed by linear regression, Pearson's correlation coefficients, Student's paired t-test, and Dice's similarity coefficients (DSC).
resultsThe inter-reader correlation is 0.97 for FGT% and 0.95 for |FGT|. When compared to the average of the two readers' manual segmentation, the proposed FCM-Atlas method achieves a correlation of r = 0.92 for FGT% and r = 0.93 for |FGT|, and the automated segmentation is not statistically significantly different (p = 0.46 for FGT% and p = 0.55 for |FGT|). The bilateral correlation between left breasts and right breasts for the FGT% is 0.94, 0.92, and 0.95 for reader 1, reader 2, and the FCM-Atlas, respectively; likewise, for the |FGT|, it is 0.92, 0.92, and 0.93, respectively. For the spatial segmentation agreement, the automated algorithm achieves a DSC of 0.69 ± 0.1 when compared to reader 1 and 0.61 ± 0.1 for reader 2, respectively, while the DSC between the two readers' manual segmentation is 0.67 ± 0.15. Additional robustness analysis shows that the segmentation performance of the authors' method is stable both with respect to selecting different cases and to varying the number of cases needed to construct the prior probability atlas. The authors' results also show that the proposed FCM-Atlas method outperforms the commonly used two-cluster FCM-alone method. The authors' method runs at ∼5 min for each 3D bilateral MR scan (56 slices) for computing the FGT% and |FGT|, compared to ∼55 min needed for manual segmentation for the same purpose.
conclusionsThe authors' method achieves robust segmentation and can serve as an efficient tool for processing large clinical datasets for quantifying the fibroglandular tissue content in breast MRI. It holds a great potential to support clinical applications in the future including breast cancer risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.