ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2013
Calculating the binding free energies of charged species based on explicit-solvent simulations employing lattice-sum methods: an accurate correction scheme for electrostatic finite-size effects.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
110 citing papers in PubMed, 247 citations in OpenAlex.
- Binding of Anthracyclines Within DNA-Topoisomerase ΙΙ Cleavage Complexes: Thermodynamics and Interactions.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Article
- One Blob to Rule Them All: A Universal Dual-Topology Nonequilibrium Framework for Relative and Absolute Binding Free Energies via a Lennard-Jones Blob Reference.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Machine-Learned Electrostatic Potentials for Accurate Hydration Free Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Free energy calculations in molecular modeling: from classical methods to machine learning.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Review
- Chloride Binding in Trimeric Coiled Coils: Free Energy and Structural Determinants from Molecular Simulations.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- EXOSC3 G191 Variants Trigger System-Wide Recalibration of RNA Processing Machinery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- BindFlow: A Free, User-Friendly Pipeline for Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations Using Free Energy Perturbation or MM(PB/GB)SA.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Alchemical Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations for Nucleotide Binding to Multimeric ATPases.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Probing Limitations of Co-Alchemical Charge Changes in Free-Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Functional Importance of Conformer-Dependent Atomic Partial Charge Assignment.Journal of computational chemistry · 2025Article
- Applying Absolute Free Energy Perturbation Molecular Dynamics to Diffusively Binding Ligands.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Designing of a novel chimeric antimicrobial peptide againstResearch in pharmaceutical sciences · 2025Article
- In silico λ-dynamics predicts protein binding specificities to modified RNAs.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Constant pH Simulation with FMM Electrostatics in GROMACS. (A) Design and Applications.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Absolute and Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations of Nucleotides to Multiple Protein Classes.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Development and Application of FeACS omega · 2025Article
- Discovery of highly potent phosphodiesterase-1 inhibitors by a combined-structure free energy perturbation approach.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024Article
- Force Field Limitations of All-Atom Continuous Constant pH Molecular Dynamics.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- BAT2: an Open-Source Tool for Flexible, Automated, and Low Cost Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The calculation of a protein-ligand binding free energy based on molecular dynamics (MD) simulations generally relies on a thermodynamic cycle in which the ligand is alchemically inserted into the system, both in the solvated protein and free in solution. The corresponding ligand-insertion free energies are typically calculated in nanoscale computational boxes simulated under periodic boundary conditions and considering electrostatic interactions defined by a periodic lattice-sum. This is distinct from the ideal bulk situation of a system of macroscopic size simulated under non-periodic boundary conditions with Coulombic electrostatic interactions. This discrepancy results in finite-size effects, which affect primarily the charging component of the insertion free energy, are dependent on the box size, and can be large when the ligand bears a net charge, especially if the protein is charged as well. This article investigates finite-size effects on calculated charging free energies using as a test case the binding of the ligand 2-amino-5-methylthiazole (net charge +1 e) to a mutant form of yeast cytochrome c peroxidase in water. Considering different charge isoforms of the protein (net charges -5, 0, +3, or +9 e), either in the absence or the presence of neutralizing counter-ions, and sizes of the cubic computational box (edges ranging from 7.42 to 11.02 nm), the potentially large magnitude of finite-size effects on the raw charging free energies (up to 17.1 kJ mol(-1)) is demonstrated. Two correction schemes are then proposed to eliminate these effects, a numerical and an analytical one. Both schemes are based on a continuum-electrostatics analysis and require performing Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) calculations on the protein-ligand system. While the numerical scheme requires PB calculations under both non-periodic and periodic boundary conditions, the latter at the box size considered in the MD simulations, the analytical scheme only requires three non-periodic PB calculations for a given system, its dependence on the box size being analytical. The latter scheme also provides insight into the physical origin of the finite-size effects. These two schemes also encompass a correction for discrete solvent effects that persists even in the limit of infinite box sizes. Application of either scheme essentially eliminates the size dependence of the corrected charging free energies (maximal deviation of 1.5 kJ mol(-1)). Because it is simple to apply, the analytical correction scheme offers a general solution to the problem of finite-size effects in free-energy calculations involving charged solutes, as encountered in calculations concerning, e.g., protein-ligand binding, biomolecular association, residue mutation, pKa and redox potential estimation, substrate transformation, solvation, and solvent-solvent partitioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.