ArticleInternational journal of preventive medicine2013
Clinical Effectiveness of Co-trimoxazole vs. Amoxicillin in the Treatment of Non-Severe Pneumonia in Children in India: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in International journal of preventive medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Community case management of fast-breathing pneumonia with 3 days oral amoxicillin vs 5 days cotrimoxazole in children 2-59 months of age in rural Pakistan: A cluster randomized trial.Journal of global health · 2022Trial
- Article
- Variation in Antibiotic Treatment Failure Outcome Definitions in Randomised Trials and Observational Studies of Antibiotic Prescribing Strategies: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Keeping It Real: Antibiotic Use Problems and Stewardship Solutions in Low- and Middle-income Countries.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2022Article
- Non-adherence to oral antibiotics for community paediatric pneumonia treatment in Malawi - A qualitative investigation.PloS one · 2018Article
- The current status of community-acquired pneumonia management and prevention in children under 5 years of age in India: a review.Therapeutic advances in infectious disease · 2016Review
- Non-adherence to community oral-antibiotic treatment in children with fast-breathing pneumonia in Malawi- secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study.Pneumonia (Nathan Qld.) · 2016Article
- High prevalence of antibiotic resistance in nasopharyngeal bacterial isolates from healthy children in rural Uganda: A cross-sectional study.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2015Article
- Improving pediatric liquid medication labeling of the hospital information system in Malaysia: qualitative analysis of pharmacists' perceptions.Pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute respiratory infection (ARI) in young children is responsible for an estimated 4.1 million deaths worldwide of which approximately 90% are due to pneumonia. To study the clinical effectiveness of co-trimoxazole versus amoxicillin in the treatment of non-severe pneumonia, as defined by WHO, in children in the age group of 02 months to 5 years. Randomized Control Trial study was conducted in out patient department of a large tertiary care hospital after taking consent from parents and ethical committee clearance.
methodsChildren in study group were treated with amoxicillin (40 mg/kg/day in 3 divided doses) and those in control group were treated with co-trimoxazole (8 mg/kg/day of trimethoprim in 2 divided doses). All cases were reviewed on second and fifth day. The effectiveness and therapy failure were decided on the basis of clinical, radiological and complete blood count results.
resultsTwo hundred and four cases of non severe pneumonia were studied. All cases were diagnosed on the basis of clinical criteria, as defined by WHO. Treatment failure was seen in 8.09% cases with amoxicillin and 39.05% cases with co-trimoxazole. Cost of one complete course with amoxicillin was 2.3 times higher than with co-trimoxazole. Compliance of therapy to co-trimoxazole (90.47%) was better than to amoxicillin (83.84%).
conclusionsThe response to treatment with amoxicillin is faster, however, compliance is slightly poorer and cost of treatment high. In order to improve the compliance, better counseling and more studies are required to ascertain the efficacy of amoxicillin in higher dosage over a shorter period of time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24319556PMC3843303W2115235644What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.