Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24318484›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2014

Consensus paper: Language and the cerebellum: an ongoing enigma.

Peter Mariën, Herman Ackermann, Michael Adamaszek, Caroline H S Barwood, Alan Beaton, John Desmond, Elke De Witte, Angela J Fawcett, Ingo Hertrich, Michael Küper and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 280 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
280citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

280 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 499 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

220 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 14 institutions in 6 countries.

Peter MariënDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Neurolinguistics, CLIN, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, peter.marien5@telenet.be.
Herman Ackermann
Michael Adamaszek
Caroline H S Barwood
Alan Beaton
John Desmond
Elke De Witte
Angela J Fawcett
Ingo Hertrich
Michael Küper
Maria Leggio
Cherie Marvel
Marco Molinari
Bruce E Murdoch
Roderick I Nicolson
Jeremy D Schmahmann
Catherine J Stoodley
Markus Thürling
Dagmar Timmann
Ellen Wouters
Wolfram Ziegler
University of Duisburg-Essen · DEJohns Hopkins University · USSwansea University · GBUniversity of Queensland · AUVrije Universiteit Brussel · BEAmerican University · USBoston University · USFondazione Santa Lucia · ITHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DESapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Tübingen · DEZNA Middelheim Hospital · BE

Funding

fMRI Investigations of Cognition in AlcoholicsR01AA018694 · NIAAA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DESMOND, JOHN E · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
Cerebro-Cerebellar Contributions to Cognitive Function in Drug AddictionK01DA030442 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARVEL, CHERIE L · 2010 to 2014
$849k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018694NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA030442NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA0304425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In less than three decades, the concept "cerebellar neurocognition" has evolved from a mere afterthought to an entirely new and multifaceted area of neuroscientific research. A close interplay between three main strands of contemporary neuroscience induced a substantial modification of the traditional view of the cerebellum as a mere coordinator of autonomic and somatic motor functions. Indeed, the wealth of current evidence derived from detailed neuroanatomical investigations, functional neuroimaging studies with healthy subjects and patients and in-depth neuropsychological assessment of patients with cerebellar disorders shows that the cerebellum has a cardinal role to play in affective regulation, cognitive processing, and linguistic function. Although considerable progress has been made in models of cerebellar function, controversy remains regarding the exact role of the "linguistic cerebellum" in a broad variety of nonmotor language processes. This consensus paper brings together a range of different viewpoints and opinions regarding the contribution of the cerebellum to language function. Recent developments and insights in the nonmotor modulatory role of the cerebellum in language and some related disorders will be discussed. The role of the cerebellum in speech and language perception, in motor speech planning including apraxia of speech, in verbal working memory, in phonological and semantic verbal fluency, in syntax processing, in the dynamics of language production, in reading and in writing will be addressed. In addition, the functional topography of the linguistic cerebellum and the contribution of the deep nuclei to linguistic function will be briefly discussed. As such, a framework for debate and discussion will be offered in this consensus paper.

Indexed as

LanguageSpeechAnimalsCerebellumCognitionHumansMemory

Identifiers

PMID24318484
PMCPMC4090012
OpenAlexW2004743606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.