Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24317997›Full record

ArticlePhotosynthesis research1993

Photoproduction of hydrogen peroxide in Photosystem II membrane fragments: A comparison of four signals.

V Klimov, G Ananyev, O Zastryzhnaya, T Wydrzynski, G Renger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photosynthesis research, 1993. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oxygen and ROS in Photosynthesis.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

V KlimovInstitute of Soil Science and Photosynthesis, Russian Academy of Science, 142292, Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia.
G Ananyev
O Zastryzhnaya
T Wydrzynski
G Renger
Institute of Physical-Chemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science · RUAustralian National University · AUTechnische Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study describes the formation of different forms of peroxide in Photosystem II (PS II) by using a chemiluminescence detection technique. Four chemiluminescence signals (A, B, C and D) of the luminolperoxidase (Lu-Per) system, which detects peroxide, are found in illuminated O2-evolving Photosystem II (PS II) membrane fragments isolated from spinach. Signal A ('free peroxide') peaking around 0.2-0.3 s after mixing PS II membrane fragments with Lu-Per is eliminated by catalase or removal of oxygen from the suspension and ascribed to O2 interaction with reduced PS II electron acceptors. In contrast, signal B peaking around 1.5 min remains largely unaffected under anaerobic conditions, as well as in the presence of catalase (20 μg/ml). Under flash illumination the extent of this signal exhibits a weak period four oscillation (maximum at third and 7th flash). Its yield increases up to the third flash, but is close to zero in the fourth flash. An analogous behaviour is observed in flashes 5 to 8. Signal B is ascribed to Lu-Per interaction with the water-oxidizing system being in S2 and/or S3-state. Signal C ('bound peroxide') detected as free peroxide after acid decomposition of illuminated PS II particles is observed on the 1 st flash and oscillates with period 2 with superposition of period 4. It is evidently related to peroxide either released from S2 or formed at S2 upon acid shock treatment. Signal D ('slowly released peroxide') peaking around 2-3 s after mixing is observed in samples after various treatments (LCC-incubation, washing with 1 M NaCl at pH 8 or with 1 M CaCl2, Cl(-)-depletion) that lead to at least partial removal of the extrinsic proteins of 18, 24 and 33 kDa without Mn extraction. The average amplitude of this signal corresponds with a yield of about 0.2 H2O2 molecules per RC and flash. In a flash train, the extent of signal D exhibits an oscillation pattern with a minimum at the 3rd flash. We assume that these treatments increase the release of 'bound' peroxide (upon injection into the Lu-Per assay) either formed in the normal oxidative pathway of the water oxidase in the S2 or the S3-state or give rise to peroxide formation due to higher accessibility of the Mn-cluster to water molecules.

Identifiers

PMID24317997
OpenAlexW1973944145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.