Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24317974›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2014

Shared subgenome dominance following polyploidization explains grass genome evolutionary plasticity from a seven protochromosome ancestor with 16K protogenes.

Florent Murat, Rongzhi Zhang, Sébastien Guizard, Raphael Flores, Alix Armero, Caroline Pont, Delphine Steinbach, Hadi Quesneville, Richard Cooke, Jerome Salse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The lack of negative association between TE load and subgenome dominance in synthesizedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. SyntenyViewer: a comparative genomics-driven translational research tool.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chromosome Pairing in Polyploid Grasses.Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Florent MuratINRA/UBP UMR 1095 GDEC (Génétique, Diversité et Ecophysiologie des Céréales), Clermont Ferrand, France.
Rongzhi Zhang
Sébastien Guizard
Raphael Flores
Alix Armero
Caroline Pont
Delphine Steinbach
Hadi Quesneville
Richard Cooke
Jerome Salse

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern plant genomes are diploidized paleopolyploids. We revisited grass genome paleohistory in response to the diploidization process through a detailed investigation of the evolutionary fate of duplicated blocks. Ancestrally duplicated genes can be conserved, deleted, and shuffled, defining dominant (bias toward duplicate retention) and sensitive (bias toward duplicate erosion) chromosomal fragments. We propose a new grass genome paleohistory deriving from an ancestral karyotype structured in seven protochromosomes containing 16,464 protogenes and following evolutionary rules where 1) ancestral shared polyploidizations shaped conserved dominant (D) and sensitive (S) subgenomes, 2) subgenome dominance is revealed by both gene deletion and shuffling from the S blocks, 3) duplicate deletion/movement may have been mediated by single-/double-stranded illegitimate recombination mechanisms, 4) modern genomes arose through centromeric fusion of protochromosomes, leading to functional monocentric neochromosomes, 5) the fusion of two dominant blocks leads to supradominant neochromosomes (D + D = D) with higher ancestral gene retention compared with D + S = D (i.e., fusion of blocks with opposite sensitivity) or even S + S = S (i.e., fusion of two sensitive ancestral blocks). A new user-friendly online tool named "PlantSyntenyViewer," available at http://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/synteny-cereal, presents the refined comparative genomics data.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, DominantGenes, PlantPolyploidySoftwareChromosomes, PlantGene DeletionGene DuplicationGenomicsKaryotypePhylogenyPoaceaeRecombination, Geneticancestordominanceduplicationevolutiongenomesynteny

Identifiers

PMID24317974
PMCPMC3914691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.