SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
The association between cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 and cervical cancer.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immune Checkpoint Molecules-Inherited Variations as Markers for Cancer Risk.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Genetic susceptibility to cervical cancer: role of common polymorphisms in apoptosis-related genes.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) gene polymorphisms have been associated with many autoimmune diseases and malignancy susceptibility, but the relationship between CTLA-4 and cervical cancer is still controversial. Hence, a meta-analysis of the published studies for the CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms and the risk of cervical cancer was performed to evaluate the association between them. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the codominant, dominant, and recessive genetic models were assessed. The fixed or random effect pooled measure was selected on the basis of the heterogeneity test among studies. The heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using the I (2). Eight studies with 2,835 cases and 2,560 controls were included. In seven studies for the CTLA-4 +49A/G polymorphism, a significant association was showed between the A allele and the increased risk of cervical cancer in the codominant (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.29), dominant (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.36), and recessive (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.56) models. In five studies for the CTLA-4 -318C/T polymorphism, the meta-analysis showed a significant association of the C allele with the reduced risk of cervical cancer in the codominant (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.94) and recessive (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.93) models. This meta-analysis suggested that +49A/G and -318C/T polymorphisms of the CTLA-4 gene were significantly associated with the risk of cervical cancer. However, further studies are required to draw a solid conclusion on the relation between the CTLA-4 polymorphism and the risk of cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.