Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24316711›Full record

Trial reportMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2014

Comparison of the effect of naproxen, etodolac and diclofenac on postoperative sequels following third molar surgery: a randomised, double-blind, crossover study.

N Akbulut, E Üstüner, C Atakan, G Çölok

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06811974 (Comparison of the Efficiency of Tissue Adhesive), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06811974 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Efficiency of Tissue Adhesive (Periacryl 90) and Silk Suture in Bilateral Mandibular Impacted Wisdom Dental Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorYuzuncu Yil UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsImpacted Mandibular Third Molar ExtractionArmsImpacted lower wisdom tooth extraction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N AkbulutAnkara University School of Medicine, Radiology Department, Sihhiye, Ankara, evrenustuner@hotmail.com.
E Üstüner
C Atakan
G Çölok
Ankara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the three non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) Diclofenac potassium, Etodolac and Naproxen sodium in relation to pain, swelling and trismus following impacted third molar surgery. STUDY

designThe study was a randomized and a double-blinded study which included 42 healthy young individuals with impacted third molars and bone retention. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n: 14) to which Diclofenac potassium, Naproxen sodium and Etodolac were administered orally an hour before the operation. Impacted third molars were surgically extracted with local anaesthesia. Visual analog scales (VAS) were used to assess the pain in the 6th, 12th hours and on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th, and 7th days postoperatively. Swelling was evaluated using ultrasound (US) and mouth opening (trismus) was measured with a composing stick pre and post operatively on the 2nd and 7th days respectively.

resultsRegarding pain alleviation, Diclofenac potassium was better than Naproxen sodium and Naproxen sodium was better than Etodolac but these differences were not statistically significant. US measurements showed that the swelling on postoperative 2nd day was significantly lowest with Diclofenac potassium as compared to others (p= 0.027) while Naproxen sodium and Etodolac acted similarly (p=0.747). No difference was noted regarding trismus in any of the groups.

conclusionNSAIDs (Diclofenac, Naproxen and Etodolac) are somehow similarly effective for controlling pain and trismus following extraction of mandibular third molars but Diclofenac potassium surpasses others in reduction of swelling.

Indexed as

Tooth ExtractionAdolescentAdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCross-Over StudiesDiclofenacDouble-Blind MethodEdemaEtodolacFemaleHumansMaleMolar, ThirdNaproxenPostoperative PainTooth, ImpactedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacEtodolacNaproxen

Identifiers

PMID24316711
PMCPMC4015047
OpenAlexW2126915602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.