Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24316442›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2014

3D actin network centerline extraction with multiple active contours.

Ting Xu, Dimitrios Vavylonis, Xiaolei Huang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Tracing and tracking filamentous structures across scales: A systematic review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Modelling Motility: The Mathematics of Spermatozoa.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Intersection To Overpass: Instance Segmentation On Filamentous Structures With An Orientation-Aware Neural Network And Terminus Pairing Algorithm.Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Workshops · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Robust Actin Filaments Image Analysis Framework.PLoS computational biology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ting XuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Dimitrios VavylonisDepartment of Physics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Xiaolei HuangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA. Electronic address: huang@cse.lehigh.edu.

Funding

Modeling and analysis of actin filament organization in yeastR01GM098430 · NIGMS · LEHIGH UNIVERSITY · PI VAVYLONIS, DIMITRIOS · 2012 to 2016
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098430NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM098430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence microscopy is frequently used to study two and three dimensional network structures formed by cytoskeletal polymer fibers such as actin filaments and actin cables. While these cytoskeletal structures are often dilute enough to allow imaging of individual filaments or bundles of them, quantitative analysis of these images is challenging. To facilitate quantitative, reproducible and objective analysis of the image data, we propose a semi-automated method to extract actin networks and retrieve their topology in 3D. Our method uses multiple Stretching Open Active Contours (SOACs) that are automatically initialized at image intensity ridges and then evolve along the centerlines of filaments in the network. SOACs can merge, stop at junctions, and reconfigure with others to allow smooth crossing at junctions of filaments. The proposed approach is generally applicable to images of curvilinear networks with low SNR. We demonstrate its potential by extracting the centerlines of synthetic meshwork images, actin networks in 2D Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy images, and 3D actin cable meshworks of live fission yeast cells imaged by spinning disk confocal microscopy. Quantitative evaluation of the method using synthetic images shows that for images with SNR above 5.0, the average vertex error measured by the distance between our result and ground truth is 1 voxel, and the average Hausdorff distance is below 10 voxels.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalActinsAlgorithmsCytoskeletonImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceSensitivity and SpecificityYeastsActinsActin filamentsActive contoursCurvilinear networksCytoskeletonNormalized cuts

Identifiers

PMID24316442
PMCPMC3945675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.