ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2014
Ex Vivo characterization of canine liver tissue viscoelasticity after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The contributions of relative brain viscosity to brain function and health.Brain communications · 2024Review
- Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2020Review
- Viscoelastic biomarker for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesion in ultra- low frequency range.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Technical Note: In vivo Young's modulus mapping of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma during HIFU ablation using harmonic motion elastography (HME).Medical physics · 2018Article
- Bubble-Induced Color Doppler Feedback for Histotripsy Tissue Fractionation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2016Article
- High intensity focused ultrasound as a tool for tissue engineering: Application to cartilage.Medical engineering & physics · 2016Article
- Article
- High-intensity focused ultrasound monitoring using harmonic motion imaging for focused ultrasound (HMIFU) under boiling or slow denaturation conditions.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2015Article
- Thermometry and ablation monitoring with ultrasound.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2015Review
- Multi-parametric monitoring and assessment of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) boiling by harmonic motion imaging for focused ultrasound (HMIFU): an ex vivo feasibility study.Physics in medicine and biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The potential of elasticity imaging to detect high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) lesions on the basis of their distinct biomechanical properties is promising. However, information on the quantitative mechanical properties of the tissue and the optimal intensity at which to determine the best contrast parameters is scarce. In this study, fresh canine livers were ablated using combinations of ISPTA intensities of 5.55, 7.16 and 9.07 kW/cm(2) and durations of 10 and 30 s ex vivo, resulting in six groups of ablated tissues. Biopsy samples were then interrogated using dynamic shear mechanical testing within the range of 0.1-10 Hz to characterize the tissue's post-ablation viscoelastic properties. All mechanical parameters were found to be frequency dependent. Compared with unablated cases, all six groups of ablated tissues had statistically significant higher complex shear modulus and shear viscosity. However, among the ablated groups, both complex shear modulus and shear viscosity were found to monotonically increase in groups 1-4 (5.55 kW/cm(2) for 10 s, 7.16 kW/cm(2) for 10 s, 9.07 kW/cm(2) for 10 s, and 5.55 kW/cm(2) for 30 s, respectively), but to decrease in groups 5 and 6 (7.16 kW/cm(2) for 30 s, and 9.07 kW/cm(2) for 30 s, respectively). For groups 5 and 6, the temperature was expected to exceed the boiling point, and therefore, the decreased stiffening could be due to the compromised integrity of the tissue microstructure. Future studies will entail estimation tissue mechanical properties in vivo and perform real-time monitoring of tissue alterations during ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.