ArticleCell2013
Structure modeling using genetically engineered crosslinking.
Article in Cell, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the Molecular Regulation of Serotonin Receptor 5-HTRJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2023Article
- Capturing Peptide-GPCR Interactions and Their Dynamics.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Class B G-protein-coupled receptors are exciting drug targets, yet the structure of a complete receptor bound to a peptide agonist has remained elusive. Coin et al. present a model of the receptor CRF1R bound to its native ligand based on partial structures and 44 spatial constraints revealed by new crosslinking approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24315089What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.