Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24314231›Full record

ReviewArthritis research & therapy2013

Animal models of fibromyalgia.

Josimari M DeSantana, Kamilla M L da Cruz, Kathleen A Sluka

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arthritis research & therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sex differences in the transition to chronic pain.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Neutrophils infiltrate sensory ganglia and mediate chronic widespread pain in fibromyalgia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bioactive Compounds for Fibromyalgia-like Symptoms: A Narrative Review and Future Perspectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Josimari M DeSantana
Kamilla M L da Cruz
Kathleen A Sluka
Universidade Federal de Sergipe · BRUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Central Mechanisms involved in the interactions between muscle pain and exerciseR01AR061371 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SLUKA, KATHLEEN A · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR061371NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR061371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models of disease states are valuable tools for developing new treatments and investigating underlying mechanisms. They should mimic the symptoms and pathology of the disease and importantly be predictive of effective treatments. Fibromyalgia is characterized by chronic widespread pain with associated co-morbid symptoms that include fatigue, depression, anxiety and sleep dysfunction. In this review, we present different animal models that mimic the signs and symptoms of fibromyalgia. These models are induced by a wide variety of methods that include repeated muscle insults, depletion of biogenic amines, and stress. All potential models produce widespread and long-lasting hyperalgesia without overt peripheral tissue damage and thus mimic the clinical presentation of fibromyalgia. We describe the methods for induction of the model, pathophysiological mechanisms for each model, and treatment profiles.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalFibromyalgiaAnimals

Identifiers

PMID24314231
PMCPMC3979153
OpenAlexW2100172604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.